T-lok v. Cams

usaf2008

New Member
Nov 27, 2003
13
0
0
What mod would be better for the money, a cam from rpm-mustang or a t-lok. I'm not sure if i want gears cause ill be goin to college soon and will be doin some highway driving, so i dont want horrible gas mileage. Or maybe someone will know of some good gears that dont get horrible gas mileage.
 
  • Sponsors (?)


Well a t-lock will help you put down the torque to both wheels instead of one. Helping you launch and it is more helpful in the rain.

If you worried about gas mileage why suggest getting a cam? That take more gas just like the gears...
 
I have 3.73 gears in my 99 auto and when i had the gears installed i lost 1/2mpg highway driving and not a thing in the city. A tlok is great for the extra traction and nomore 1 wheel burnouts.

As for the cam you have to do alot more work to put one in compared to the Tlok so its cheaper in that way. But youll gain some good power with the cam with a good tune.
 
Blown3.8 said:
I have 3.73 gears in my 99 auto and when i had the gears installed i lost 1/2mpg highway driving and not a thing in the city. A tlok is great for the extra traction and nomore 1 wheel burnouts.

As for the cam you have to do alot more work to put one in compared to the Tlok so its cheaper in that way. But youll gain some good power with the cam with a good tune.
how much gain can be seen from cams on a natually aspirated engine? has any one seen what the power out put would be with a turbo? better/ worse??
Im just a little couriouse.
merry christmas,
stallion
 
Stallion said:
how much gain can be seen from cams on a natually aspirated engine? has any one seen what the power out put would be with a turbo? better/ worse??
Im just a little couriouse.
merry christmas,
stallion

With a tuned chip, pulleys, cai, exhaust:

Just cam= 220rwhp
Cam,p&p heads, intake = 260rwhp