Thanks KJ for the long overdue tribute/article focusing strictly on the 94-95's. I was VERY excited to see our little nitch get some press. I also liked the little stangnet plug too! Thanks, and I suggest anyone that reads these boards picks up a copy of the June 2006 issue and turns to page 98 and reads up. KJ, if you are reading this I don't agree that the 96-98 tail light swap is a popular one though, and I think most here would agree! Thanks again!
I finally got my old school 94 - 95 tails, now I have both so whatever mood strikes me is whats going on that week...
sweet action, thanks alot KJ!!! I'll have to pick this up soon and have a read.... Putting Vertical lights on your 94-95 mustang is like getting breast implants if you're a man...sure, they look good to you, but everybody's laughing at you at the same time
I have to say I used to like the 96+ tails and that was almost my first mod but decided against it, im glad I did.
Before i got my 95 that was one of the first mods i had planned, but now that i have it i will never do that.
yeah i will admit did not like the 94/95 taillights so i switched to the 96 tail lights the only 94/95 cars i like with those lights are the 95 black cobra's with spoiler think those stock lights look awesome only on that color!!! call me wierd!! yeah great they finally did something on the 94/95 cars have not read up on it yet!!! they don't like us because they stuck leftover t-bird motors in those cars!!! hahaha
ill def pick up a copy...and i love my 96-98 tails wouldnt go back to the 94-95 tails if you paid me. haha
The article was okay. A little too short and not technical enough to really get its point across. The article made it seem like modding a 94-95 just wasn't worth the headache because of the EEC-IV in our cars. Well, we all know you can mod a 94-95 if you use the right parts. There is no shortage of exhaust choices for our cars. And, there are OTS cams designed to work with the vacuum needs of the 94-95 ECU. There is more but I don't want to ramble too much here because you already know what I am getting at with this. I will admit that mod for mod a Fox will be quicker than a 94-95 I would still rather own and drive my 95 over a Fox anyday I too am a fan of the horizontal tail lights. Just seems like one of the only ways to tell if a Mustang is a 94-95 from a quick glance. And, I believe our cars are unique in a good way. :SNSign: No offense to 5.0 Mustang & SF or its authors. I have had a subscription since I bought my Mustang in April 2002 and enjoy the magazine throughly.
I like the 96-98 tails better until I learned that the horizontal tails with the GT mean 302 power... If you have a 6 I say swap away...
