miamifiveoh
Founding Member
Mustang5L5 said:So why don't we drill our flywheels then?
I'd like to hear custom89stang's logic applied to this question.
FIRST, The job of the brake system is to CONVERT the kinetic energy of forward motion into heat. This is accomplished by the friction of the brake pad acting on the rotor.
THEN, The rotor's job is to absorb this heat. The more mass the rotor has, the more heat it can absorb, and hence, the more braking ability. If you remove mass from the rotor (by drilling or slotting), you are decreasing the mass of the rotor, thereby decereasing its ability to absorb heat, thereby decreasing it's braking ability.
NEXT, the rotor has to dissipate the heat it just absorbed. This is accomplished via the venting present in most brake rotors. Some, like '94+ GT's, still use solid REAR rotors, though.
Fortunately, there has been a lot of new technology in brake pads in the last 50 years, so we don't need to worry about outgassing as much as we used to. Therefore, cross-drillied rotors are primarily an aesthetic upgrade.
Many will point to the 'high-performance' vehicles that are factory equipped with cross drilled rotors. Keep in mind that these rotors are much larger than the typical 10.84" Mustang rotor, and can AFFORD to lose some mass in exchange for the high-performance cross-drilled look. They certainly do look cool.
Here is a quote from a a thread on the corral (I don't care to reinvent the wheel):
Regarding extra surface area provided by the holes:
quote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure you increase the surface area, but where? Not in the prime spots of cooling airflow, and perpendicular to the direction of the normal flow. I believe at best they would be turbulence generators for existing cooling air flow. Heat dissipation depends on airflow, and lots of it, over the rotors, and through the open center section of a vented rotor, the holes don't do anything to increase the amount of airflow, and the additioanl srface area they do provide, isn't in the best place to make use of the existing airflow anyway.
If you are really having that much of a heat dissipation issue in a given application, rather than make your rotors weaker, I would recommend improving the brake ducting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Regarding the airflow improvement provided by cross-drilling:
quote:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not nearly as much as you think. A vented brake rotor works much like a centrifugal air pump, as the rotor spins, it creates low pressure areas behind the vanes, and air is drawn in from the center of the rotor to fill that low pressure area. So basically air is pumped from the center of the rotor radially outward (this is why you direct the ducting to the center of the rotor, for it to pick up the colder air). When you drill holes in the face, it takes a lot away from the centrifugal pump effect by not allowing the low pressure area to build up nearly as effectively.
And proper ducting is always useful, well, as long as you are moving anyway.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you like drilled/slotted rotors? Go ahead and buy them. Nobody is telling you NOT to. However, recognize that your are performing an aesthetic modification and not a performance enhancing one. There is nothing wrong with that.
Here is some more for you guys that like this topic:
http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=355711
http://corner-carvers.com/altimathread.php.html
Bon apetit,