The Truth about FOX FRONT BRAKES!

Discussion in 'Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech' started by custom89stang, Feb 17, 2004.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 93 teal terror

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2001
    Messages:
    1,049
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    37
    Location:
    Durham N.C.
    Your right except that theres more load on the drilled ones.......

    The brake pad delivers whatever force the piston produces no matter what. With the drilled rotors you have less contact area with the rotor so lets say the Distributed load on the solid one is 50N/mm and the drilled one is 61N/mm
    multiply that time surface area to get equivelant loading. So lets say the Suface area of the drilled is 984mm^2 and the SA. of the nondrilled rotor is 1200mm^2. When you multiply 50N/mm^2*1200mm^2 you get 60,000N. When you multiply 984mm^2*61mm^2 you still get 60,000N. Conservation of engery. When you calculate friction, you have to use the equivelant loading. So its the same Ffr no matter what. All less SA. is doing is increasing the pressure on the rotors. Does that make sense Mustang5L5?
     
    #141
  2. 93 teal terror

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2001
    Messages:
    1,049
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    37
    Location:
    Durham N.C.
    Yes they will heat up faster b/c of the increased pressure per mm^2 or in^2 whichever you like. All drilling holes in it is doing is increasing distributed loading.
     
    #142
  3. Sicarius428

    Sicarius428 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    2,086
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    49
    It's all about drum breaks... They have the most surface area.
    Kevin
     
    #143
  4. Mustang5L5

    Mustang5L5 Car used in adult film "Highway Gangbang-InDaButt"
    SN Certified Technician Founding Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2001
    Messages:
    21,780
    Likes Received:
    341
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    I think it's time we give this thread a break and move on.

    I'm doing way too much thinking and not getting paid for any of it ;)
     
    #144
  5. horseplay91

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2002
    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Lake in the Hills, IL.

    i know what your saying but that isnt really an apples to apples comparison. like mentioned earlier the friction caused by braking is dynamic. whereas in your example, would be static.
     
    #145
  6. chaka

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2002
    Messages:
    1,347
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Same here. Time to think about all the projects that are piling up :(
     
    #146
  7. chaka

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2002
    Messages:
    1,347
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    I didn't want to bother with the angular acceleration yet. Figured it would have just added more confusion. But this thread is done.

    :lock:
     
    #147
  8. maverick0716

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2002
    Messages:
    3,927
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Chilliwack, BC, Canada
    Wow! This thread is hilarious! :rlaugh: I also love how Custom89Stang ignores all the good points people are proving about the NON slotted/drilled rotors. And about the "holes" making the pad grab the disc better? Gimme a friggin break! Thats some major bull crap your spewing out there :nonono:

    One more point - If slottled/drilled rotors are so much better than why don't all the high performance cars have them? Have you ever seen the discs on an Audi S8? 14 inches, NON slottled/drilled.
     
    #148
  9. miamifiveoh

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2002
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    You can't use that argument around here Maverick, because it will be countered with, "Drilled/slotted is obviously better because Porsche uses them..." :nonono:
     
    #149
  10. maverick0716

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2002
    Messages:
    3,927
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Chilliwack, BC, Canada
    I'm aware of that. And I do agree that they stop better/faster after normal non slotted drilled would start to fade (as in race applications) But if you take the same size rotors, non slotted vs. slotted/drilled and do a braking test from say 60 or 100-0 mph you would find the non-slotted will actually brake in less distance.
     
    #150
  11. IndyBlk5.0

    IndyBlk5.0 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New Whiteland, IN
    :flame: :doh: Ok guys, this can be dragged out forever becuase of two simple facts. 1) people have their own independant opinions. 2) some people disagree with others just to disagree. I am taking no sides on this issue. It is simply user preferance, if you think they will be better than stock, then do it, if your conscience tells you no, then dont do it. Plain and simple, and quite frankly that is more than likely how it is going to end up happening anyways.
     
    #151
  12. custom89stang

    custom89stang New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2003
    Messages:
    705
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    cuz ur a dumb'Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me' is why u spent it. i dont know enough about the mechanics/physics of a flywheel to tell u
     
    #152
  13. custom89stang

    custom89stang New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2003
    Messages:
    705
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Wow You Guys. Love The Controversy. I Am Reading Some Of The Points. Glad You Guys Think You Know Everything. I Actually Think Its Hilarious, But Alas I Think Everyone Is Right. Screw This Thread.
     
    #153
  14. 91BlckGT

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 1999
    Messages:
    2,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Location:
    in a van, down by the river
    And screw you too. I've only managed to make it three pages in, but you've come across as arrogant and a know-it-all. I believe the title of this thread should be: "My opinion about FOX brakes".

    I'll :lock: this thread for now, just to give me a chance to catch up on the reading. If I actually find some valuable tech in here, I'll leave it up, but thus far, I've only seen a combative stance from most...

    **EDIT**

    Well, I'm leaving it locked. I liked all this friction / stopping force talk, but it all comes down this:

    Stock fox brakes do indeed suck. Upgrade them.

    Slotted or cross-drilled do not provide any performance benefit whatsoever on the street. All they do is generate more brake dust.

    Why do people add slotted or cross-drilled? Because they look sweet. At least that's why I put them on. :D
     
    #154
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page