Turbo V-6

Discussion in '2005 - 2009 Specific Tech' started by spanky442, Feb 12, 2004.

  1. SVTdriver

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2001
    Messages:
    3,425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle Wa
    You're right it isn't a falcon. They are very nice cars. But I tend to think that it's a little bit more expensive than I want to pay for a car
     
    #21
  2. RiceEating5.0

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2001
    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That 4.0 I6 is making that 320hp at a measly 6psi of boost i've heard. This was done so it wouldn't produce more power than the more expensive Xr-8 5.4 v8 model. I've heard it is capable of 400 easily.

    Anyone heard of the new FPV Turbo I6? 380hp, and the tq to match. All from a turbo I6. Not bad at all.

    Still, gimme my v8 when it comes to mustangs. Traditional Mustang performance=v8, nothing else. I would however like to see that turbo I6 in the upcoming Futura....maybe SVT futura??? mmmm.
     
    #22
  3. GelatiCruiser

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2002
    Messages:
    1,083
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    1 Mile South of Somewhere.
    :stupid:
     
    #23
  4. spanky442

    spanky442 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :stick:
     
    #24
  5. 98CobraClone

    98CobraClone New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2003
    Messages:
    615
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Ripley, Ohio
    I'm sure that if Ford would S/C a V6 they'd only put 5-6 lbs. in it. They scream pretty good with 11 #, and it's comparable to V8's.......but the sound doesn't compare at all to a good throaty rumble of a V8
     
    #25
  6. Route666

    Route666 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,654
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    39
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Yeh it's pretty good, but I was joking about the Cobra not being a Falcon, in a sports sense anyway. I agree, it is more than I'd want to pay too, but it is good quality, it is worth it, even if not in the $/hp/lb department.
     
    #26
  7. SVTdriver

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2001
    Messages:
    3,425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle Wa
    I'm sure they are good quality vehicles. And although I've always been a mustang fan. If it was available here I might even consider buying one.
     
    #27
  8. Boss351

    Boss351 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2004
    Messages:
    119
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    Why not a V12 with 4 turbos?
     
    #28
  9. Route666

    Route666 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,654
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    39
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Sorry to continue this OT discussion, but I just have to say, while the turbo 6 falcon works out to 33 grand US, the stang cobras that we can buy here (converted to rhd by ford, upgraded lights, etc) is bloody 90 grand! Which means if Ford US imported Falcons, converted to lhd, it would probably be a 50-60 grand (US) car, or more.
     
    #29
  10. SadbutTrue

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2002
    Messages:
    2,358
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    49
    Location:
    Granada Hills, California
    How much are Holden Monaros in your country... they are 35k here... that would be the best example of what it would cost to import the Falcon..
     
    #30
  11. Islander03GT

    Islander03GT New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    473
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Simi Valley, Ca
    not to mention the fact that that 4.0 I-6 turbo motor probably isnt US Emissions certified.
     
    #31
  12. SVTdriver

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2001
    Messages:
    3,425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle Wa
    I hear ya. I'm not entirely sure that it can't be done cheaper though.
     
    #32
  13. KidTwist51

    KidTwist51 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2003
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    17
    Location:
    Beverly Hills, MI
    A forced-induction V6 thread... no offense to the person that didn't bother to think before asking that question, but how was this even allowed to take up space in this forum?

    :bang:

    -Chris
     
    #33
  14. Route666

    Route666 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,654
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    39
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Yeh that's probably correct, although you'd be surprised, the 290kW BOSS motors in the 1950kg cars get 11 - 14 k/L (25.9 - 33 mpg) and the 6 and turbo 6 do better (only slightly for turbo 6).
     
    #34
  15. Route666

    Route666 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,654
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    39
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    #35
  16. spanky442

    spanky442 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hey, I got tired of reading about a sub $20K GT and IRS. That seems to be the only discussion around here. So, I figured why not throw some more silly topics in here. :cheers:
     
    #36
  17. KidTwist51

    KidTwist51 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2003
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    17
    Location:
    Beverly Hills, MI
    Alright, good point, haha. I was a little irritable when I wrote that, I owe you a beer. :cheers:

    -Chris
     
    #37
  18. oogtdude

    oogtdude Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Messages:
    1,628
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    turbo v6..yea ok....where did you newbs come from? the honda forums?....the v6 is for low income buyers...dont you think a turbo will bring price up?...whats the sense in a v6 turbo..when there v8 is there flagship?....DOH
     
    #38
  19. Ray III

    Ray III New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2004
    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
    60 degree V6 engines are a good design with much greater strength than a V8 engine. Each piston has its own crank throw, with more iron between cylinders and seven main bearings. The crank throws are offset by 120 degrees in groups of three, which means the engine is internally balanced. No wonder these motors are used for high specific outputs at high speeds, like the 3 liter 320 horsepower twin turbo that was previously built by Mitsubishi.

    Still, while the V8 design is no better than a weak four-cylinder with double pistons, you can't argue with the sound and displacement and smoothness of power production.
     
    #39
  20. Route666

    Route666 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,654
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    39
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Hey, I've forgotten, so please enlighten me, how is it that straight 6s are better than V? Are they better balanced? I seem to remember it is something like that.
     
    #40

Share This Page