vacuum secondaries -vs- mechanical... throttle response

Discussion in 'Classic Mustang Specific Tech' started by BelueLX, Jun 1, 2004.

  1. BelueLX

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 1999
    Messages:
    1,198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ive heard to get a carb with mechanical secondaries for throttle response / drag racing. I found a good deal on one with vacuum secondaries. How much will the vacuum secondaries hurt me off the line and at the strip? Havent really dealt with carbs much Ive always had efi. Thanks,

    Cody B
     
    #1
  2. thehueypilot

    thehueypilot Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    37
    Location:
    Medina,Tennessee
    I am running a Quick Fuel 850 w/ vac sec and I have a 1.70 60' time. A friend of mine is running a 750 double pumper and has about the same 60' time. Its funny that the guys running carbs are looking into EFI and the EFI guys are looking at carbs.
     
    #2
  3. BelueLX

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 1999
    Messages:
    1,198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    best 60' with the charger was a 1.74. im going to try the vac carb if i dont like it i can always sell it for what i paid.
     
    #3
  4. Great68

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2002
    Messages:
    707
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Victoria BC
    My Classic Mustang will stay carbed until the world runs out of oil.

    But any new car I ever buy would stay EFI.
     
    #4
  5. rbohm

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2002
    Messages:
    6,413
    Likes Received:
    273
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Location:
    tucson,az
    vacuum vs mechanical secondaries have been debated since forever it seems. depending on your combination i doubt you will lose much if at all, and the difference in driveability between the two can be great on the street, again depending on your combo.
     
    #5
  6. Hack

    Hack Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2004
    Messages:
    1,916
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    39
    Location:
    Minneapolis
    What I've heard is that mechanical secondaries are better for manual transmission cars, vacuum for automatics. But, that is for the street, I think.

    If you go to Holley's web site, you can email them and get the experts' opinion.
     
    #6
  7. BelueLX

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 1999
    Messages:
    1,198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    another question: with a C4 transmission and a 3.73 gear, how many miles per gallon is normal?
     
    #7
  8. allcarfan

    allcarfan The Answer Man
    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2001
    Messages:
    3,747
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Location:
    North Atlanta
    Cant you make a vaccuum secondary carburetor perform as if it has mechanical secondaries simply by modifying the throttle linkages on the carb?
     
    #8
  9. Great68

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2002
    Messages:
    707
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Victoria BC
    You can, but that presents a problem. You don't have the extra squirt of fuel that a second accelerator pump provides, which would mean you would bog out pretty bad.
     
    #9
  10. 10secgoal

    10secgoal Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2003
    Messages:
    2,806
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    47
    Location:
    San Diego
    Exactly. You would have just built an expensive Edelbog. :rolleyes:
     
    #10
  11. allcarfan

    allcarfan The Answer Man
    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2001
    Messages:
    3,747
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Location:
    North Atlanta
    grrrr, wish my speed demon was mech secondaries
     
    #11

Share This Page