Flavadave4
Active Member
onefstsnake said:
I think the 93 Cobra will be the winner of all the foxes, with exception to the R model
what will be worth more?
- Thread starter nonglossjason
- Start date
I think the 93 Cobra will be the winner of all the foxes, with exception to the R model
-
Sponsors (?)
Cwalk
New Member
Maybe its a Virginia and North Carolina thing. But I see notches all over the place. Its not to hard to spot 'em. Hard to get the owners to sell 'em? Yeah.
To the Mustang enthusiast...the Notch probably...due to rarity...or the ever-elusive T-Top Fox3. 
Seriously though. I'm wondering how many Fox3 T-top cars are there? less than 93 Cobras?
Seriously though. I'm wondering how many Fox3 T-top cars are there? less than 93 Cobras?
'66 coupe
Founding Member
Flavadave4 said:
I was just saying that it doesn't matter if a car was more expensive when new, it may not necessarily be more valuable down the road.
For instance, I'm sure the '95 GTS cars will be more collectible than GT's.
The main thing comes down to what people want. A car is only worth what someone is willing to pay. That's why I personally think the LX's will be more valueable because their looks aren't as dated as the GT's.
If we're shooting for rarity, I wouldn't mind owning one of the Saleen Notch SSP's.
fox racer
Member
Woodrow
Founding Member
I am going to say a notch will be worth more because over time it’s going to be hard to find one that wasn’t cutup to make a drag car. There will always be plenty of gt's in good shape just because of speculators; this is not the same with a notch imo.
grey5.0beast
Cookies should never be DUNKED!!!
nonglossjason said:
Jason,
I couldn't find a clean reasonably priced Notch when I started looking. There were a bunch of hatchbacks around but very few coupes. In the Portland area the drag racer and the local shop guys s n atch the coupes up almost as quick as they show up on CL.
I like my GT but I wish I would have run across a deal like you got on your Notch.
In the long run I'm not sure which will be worth more, but right now, locally, the coupes seem to be hard to get your hands on.
Keith
RedFoxGT said:
Either there is a large difference in taste between the U.S. and Canada, or that's just a silly statement. It may be perceived as bias because I own a coupe, but I spotted my first one at 7 and since that age I hated the looks of GT's and still do. I find it hard to go anywhere in my car without people telling me how nice it is.
Dont get me wrong, there are some amazing GT's on this site, but a stock looking GT looks like a giant turd to me. Flat in the front, flat in the back, gay sideskirts.
Obviously just my opinion, but through my experiences, people around these parts prefer the look of a notch (or lx, period) over a GT anyday.Take a look around and notice how many people are saying they want a notch, and how many of those people are selling their GT's or their lx hatches to buy one.
..But opinions are like @ssholes, everyones got 'em and they all stink...
Edit: This only applies to aero years. The 4 eye notches dont do it for me, but the gts do. I love 79-82 GT's, Capris', aero lx hb's, etc. I just dont like stock aero GT's.
795.0pacecar
lover of pudgy polygamists
Neither will be worth much. You dont see regular 67+ mustangs going for much, it is only the ones that have something special about them or that everyone all of a sudden have a hard on for that go up in value. Pace cars, cobras, mclarens, saleens, and anniversary cars will be worth the most but still not a whole lot. Pace cars are almost 30 years old and even mint ones rarely go for more than 20k.
i think the 94-98 model cars wil NEVER be worth as much as the foxes. other than the 70's mustang II i think those are the ugliest things going! i remember when i saw my first 94GT i got so depressed...i figured it would be the end of the mustang! then that GARBAGE motor they put in the 96's...... i'm glad they unF'd that situation.....
'66 coupe
Founding Member
KCoppola said:
LOL
That's what most people think about foxes. Also, our cars are ALREADY worth more than foxes. It was a good prediction though...but not really.
'66 coupe
Founding Member
795.0pacecar said:
The problem with the '79 Pace cars is that they weren't that limited; unlike '65 and '94.
90
Active Member
verts would be better if you could actually find parts for them. makes me sad that I bought one.
'66 coupe
Founding Member
stykthyn said:
You won't feel bad in the long run. 'Verts will always be worth more than hardtops because once a car is a collectible it usually only sees good weather. Most people will pay more money to be able to drop the top if they're gonna keep a car for good weather.
If you're looking at it from a racing standpoint though, a fox chassis 'vert will always flex like laughy taffy.
Flavadave4
Active Member
[QUOTE='66 coupe]You won't feel bad in the long run. 'Verts will always be worth more than hardtops because once a car is a collectible it usually only sees good weather. Most people will pay more money to be able to drop the top if they're gonna keep a car for good weather.
If you're looking at it from a racing standpoint though, a fox chassis 'vert will always flex like laughy taffy.[/QUOTE]
Except the Fox vert is just ugly........OMG did i just say that out loud?
If you're looking at it from a racing standpoint though, a fox chassis 'vert will always flex like laughy taffy.[/QUOTE]
Except the Fox vert is just ugly........OMG did i just say that out loud?
There is a VAST difference in production #'s. There are waaaay less notches than hatches. Based on that alone they'll fetch more.
Gt's are a dime a dozen.
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=530421&highlight=production+numbers
Gt's are a dime a dozen.
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=530421&highlight=production+numbers
