I am a huge Mustang fan, but the article comparing the 05 GTO and the 05 Mustang seems to be very contradicting. I was glad to see the Mustang win, andwas expecting to hear about how well it must have performed. But, when read all they did was praise the GTO and bash the Stang. I was left wondering why the Mustang won. I'm thinking that the dynamics of the Mustang must have been that much better than the GTOs, but, they loved the GTO for its handling characteristics even if the Mustang put out better numbers. They continually bashed the Mustang for the live axle, turn-in, huge wheel, numb steering, deep gauges, and cornering. I think the only positive thing said was the good looks and great shifter. Why praise the car that lost and bash the car that won? I'm stumped.