After reading several threads and searching through the forums I am stuck with a question:
Why would someone choose to use the Painless kit (or similar) over stock-type replacement pieces? From what I have read the "painless" kit seems anything but.
I am starting a 4th (or so) semi-restoration of a stang I have owned since the mid 80's, and I am realizing I have some wiring issues with (mainly) the headlight and guage feed sections, in addition to some underdash hacks that I am thinking I can live with.
One of my concerns is doing it right and somewhat historically correct. My ride is a safety upgraded (brakes, steering, susp) weekend cruiser with 4bbl/intake/headers.
I guess I'm just curious to hear why people chose one over the other.
Why would someone choose to use the Painless kit (or similar) over stock-type replacement pieces? From what I have read the "painless" kit seems anything but.
I am starting a 4th (or so) semi-restoration of a stang I have owned since the mid 80's, and I am realizing I have some wiring issues with (mainly) the headlight and guage feed sections, in addition to some underdash hacks that I am thinking I can live with.
One of my concerns is doing it right and somewhat historically correct. My ride is a safety upgraded (brakes, steering, susp) weekend cruiser with 4bbl/intake/headers.
I guess I'm just curious to hear why people chose one over the other.