Wingless GT pics

Discussion in '2005 - 2009 Specific Tech' started by detmack81, Jan 20, 2004.


  1. detmack81

    detmack81 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2003
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  2. bit

    bit Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 1999
    Messages:
    1,986
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Location:
    Anderson, SC
    I want one without a wing. I think it looks a lot better on the current model as well.
    #2
  3. skywarp

    skywarp New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2003
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
  4. (&)

    (&) Founding Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2002
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Kansas
    I agree with this guy:

    #4
  5. sweet~Low~93

    sweet~Low~93 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2001
    Messages:
    640
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Toledo Ohio
    #5
  6. Ron Jeremy

    Ron Jeremy New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2003
    Messages:
    753
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Hollywood, California...I live next door to Jenna
    I think that it looks good with as well as without the wing.

    I prefer to have the wing though. It looks less like a regular sportsroof Mustang and more like a retro Mustang with the wing. The rear end of the 2005 resembles the 69-70 Mustang. And the rear ends of the 69-70 Mustangs looked much nicer with the rear spoiler wing on them. That's just my opinion though.
    #6
  7. GelatiCruiser

    GelatiCruiser Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2002
    Messages:
    1,083
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    1 Mile South of Somewhere.
    Agreed. Although pre-05 Stangs + Wingless = :drool:
    #7
  8. (&)

    (&) Founding Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2002
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Kansas
    Ok, this is the second time I've seen you say the 2005 looks like the 69-70, and I'm totally not seeing it, so can you explain why you think it looks like the 69-70? Most of what I see is similarities to the 65-66 fastback.
    #8
  9. Iwvustang

    Iwvustang Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2001
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Ann Arbor, MI
    how could anyone refer to that wing as a "gawky, J.C. Whitney-looking wing." Its not like they used a Lancer Evo wing...

    It doesnt NEED a wing to speak "power," but I think it looks nice either way, and to each his own.
    #9
  10. (&)

    (&) Founding Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2002
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Kansas
    Because it looks like a tacked-on afterthought. It's just not very well integrated with the rest of the car.

    I think the EVO wing is tacky but at least it's functional.
    #10
  11. Ron Jeremy

    Ron Jeremy New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2003
    Messages:
    753
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Hollywood, California...I live next door to Jenna
    Look at the rear end of the 2005 Mustang. Stand in the back of the car and look directly at the rear tail lights and at the rear facia of the car. The rear facia and tail lights on the 2005 look exactly like the 60 and 70 Mustang.

    What you are referring to that looks like a 66 fastback is the side view of the 2005 Mustang. Especially with the triangular window which is the same styling like the 65 and 66 Mustang Fastback. But the rear facia looks like the 69 and 70 Mustang fastback.
    #11

Share This Page