Would you like a more powerful GT? Would you sacrfice the V8 engine for it?

Discussion in '2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-' started by 300bhp/ton, Jun 21, 2005.

?

Prefferred engine:

  1. 300bhp 4.6 V8

    155 vote(s)
    90.6%
  2. 350bhp 2.0 Turbo 4 cylinder

    16 vote(s)
    9.4%
  1. 300bhp/ton

    300bhp/ton New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2005
    Messages:
    530
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    England
    With lots of talk that Ford didn't offer enough power with the new GT, here's an option that could well have been a reality (similar options where once considered in the early 1990's).

    Would you rather have a:

    1. 300bhp/320lb ft 4.6 V8 as per the current lineup

    or

    2. 2.0 litre 16v Turbo 4 cylinder with 350bhp/360lb ft


    Such an engine already exists in the form of the 2.0 Ford ZeeTec which in mild turbo form produced 220bhp for the Focus RS, however this engine also appears destined for the forthcoming Cosworth Focus with 330-350bhp.
     
    #1
  2. SpazHairlip

    SpazHairlip New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    4 cylinders are not cars, they are lawn mowers.
     
    #2
  3. QCStang

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2002
    Messages:
    899
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Aylmer, Quebec, Canada
    Low end Torque. Nothing better.

    The V8 has FAR more potential. Add a KB twinscrew.
     
    #3
  4. bigaloz

    bigaloz New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New Jersey
    V8 only
     
    #4
  5. JST4FN

    JST4FN New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I 've owned two SVO's and they are fun as hell, but I believe the Mustang should have a V8 and keep it. A speciality car however would not bother me, but I think a 6 cylinder(w/turbo) would be a better choice because of the cars weight.

    Thanks Mike
     
    #5
  6. Mossberg

    Mossberg Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,217
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    ATL, Shawty
    V8 or nothing. The sound alone is worth it even if it sacrifices horsepower.
     
    #6
  7. Mickey21

    Mickey21 New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2002
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    I would easily give up 50HP to get 4 more cylinders... Heck I would EASILY take a 250HP V12!! Sign me up... :)
     
    #7
  8. 05Stangster

    05Stangster New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    Nothing like the rumble of a V8. Nough said.
     
    #8
  9. bigcat

    bigcat start with the upper hole, and if more traction is

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Messages:
    4,245
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    79
    Location:
    7200 feet
    V8, no rice burners
     
    #9
  10. crewwolfy

    crewwolfy New Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2005
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    I'd love to see a RWD 4banger come out of ford, similar to Nissan's older 240SX. But don't do it to the Mustang.
     
    #10
  11. 199

    199 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    V8 = Muscle


    So i will go with the V8 mucle anytime its not just hp numbers its the felling of the V8 rumbling.
     
    #11
  12. whiteboyslo

    whiteboyslo New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Diego (RB)
    not in the mustang, but as a focus owner i have to say the idea of a ford turbo 4 making that much HP gives me wood.

    they should bring it over either in a SE focus or in some other model like the Aussie Falcon. God that car is sexy!

    oh, and 4 cyl does not equal rice. fartcans, bodykits installed bot not painted, excessive neon (or any neon for that matter), or mods that make for no performance but look like they should equal rice. please get it right.

    Mike
     
    #12
  13. delurker

    delurker New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    V8, mang. Otherwise, it may as well be front-wheel driive.
     
    #13
  14. crewwolfy

    crewwolfy New Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2005
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Chicago, IL

    I agree, but what about these 3/4 scoops for the stang? Is this ricing it out? Scoops there generally cool the rear brakes when functional, but all you're doing with a stang is taping on some shaped urethane. Just curious what you guys think.
     
    #14
  15. NVERL8

    NVERL8 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    9
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    Go big or go home. V8
     
    #15
  16. D.Hearne

    D.Hearne Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2000
    Messages:
    12,124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    south louisiana
    :D Horsepower is one thing but what really moves the car is torque, and that 4 banger has none to speak of. Sure it'll move a 1500-2000 lb car smartly, :nice: but stick it in a 3000 lb car, and you ain't going nowhere fast. :bang:
     
    #16
  17. D.Hearne

    D.Hearne Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2000
    Messages:
    12,124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    south louisiana
    if I had my druthers, I'd much rather prefer my 331-sixpack under the hood of my new Stang.
     
    #17
  18. CatmanJJ

    CatmanJJ Captain Tangnet

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Messages:
    4,567
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Maryland
    Didn't they already try a Turbo I-4 for Stangs, weren't they more pricey and didn't sell that much back then, why would they now? The modular V8s are much cheaper to produce and use in Mustangs (the whole point of the Modular engine family line) then building a limited highly tuned high HP turbo 4 banger. If they're gonna stop making a high horsepower Mustang that is not a V8 they should just build something else which they tried with the Ford Probe back in the late 80's to mid 90's, which was supposed to be the Mustang replacement, everyone cried out and we all know what eventually happened with that car. Afterall the Mustangs main selling point is not power, it's only part of the equation. Mustangs are cars for everyone. :flag:
     
    #18
  19. svtash

    svtash New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vista, CA
    i have a svt focus right now (06 GT on order) and a 350hp turbo motor would be awesome in the foci. One of the main reasons i am switching back to the stang though is cause i miss my V8. There is nothing like the growl of a nice V8. I ..miss...*sniffle*...it. But will have it again soon.
     
    #19
  20. Pliskin

    Pliskin New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Trying to go up a hill in a 4cyl.....Priceless.


    A turbo 4cyl seems more like a ricer engine than an American muscle car engine.
     
    #20

Share This Page