X-pipe gains .3 off of 1/4

Discussion in 'SN95 4.6 Talk' started by QuickCapri83, Aug 16, 2006.

  1. QuickCapri83 New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 5, 2004
    Message Count:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    North East, PA
    So after installing my pipe, I consistantly knock off .3 and gain about 5mph in the quarter. This using a Gtech, they're very accurate tho, we tested before installation of all mods also. Another thing that's weird, my friends 5.0, and MY 5.0 Capri, didnt gain anything at all that I could tell, or he. Ofcourse I didnt have a Gtech at the time, but the H-pipe on my 5.0 defoantly didnt do what my X did for my 4.6....Is there a difference in the motors, one wants to breath better?

    Or maybe my 4.6 is just liking the pipe alot, I know some cars just run good for no apparent reason...It runs better then my few friends that have 99+ 4.6's. I dont get it :shrug:
  2. RoadconeTuning New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Message Count:
    461
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Upstate, SC
    factory freak and it responds well to the pipe... theres somethign like 8* tolerance allowed in the stock cam timing... thats a bit insane to me...
  3. BooWFO New Member

    Member Since:
    May 11, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    3 tenths and 5 mph??? that be like what a 30-50rwhp increase?
    well anyways congrats.
  4. DerekStangGT My package is in the mail!

    Member Since:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Message Count:
    1,087
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Gtech=:notnice:

    track=:nice:
  5. 01BlkGT Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 22, 2002
    Message Count:
    1,016
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    ATX
    Something doesn't seem right, b/c I got a 5mph and .5 tenth gain in the 1/4 from track timing with LT's and prochamber. So either your car was extremely rich from the factory and was running slower than the avg. and the x-pipe leaned it out, or the gtech is not very accurate. Also keep in mind, the way gtech and 1/4 trap speeds are calculated differently. Have you done a before and after dyno?
  6. QU!CK New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Message Count:
    148
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    GTECH isn't as accurate as most people are led to believe ;)

    For reference, I dropped ~.2 in the 1/8th when I did my FULL exhaust (ie, long tubes, o/r midpipe, and catback).


    -J
  7. WillDuhhBeast New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 26, 2005
    Message Count:
    348
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Jacksonville Florida


    +- two tenths in the 8th is an awesome gain considered in the 1/4th
  8. QU!CK New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Message Count:
    148
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC

    Thanks :nice:

    I did a before and after dyno. The car picked up ~20rwhp/rwtq and a very nice kick in the pants :D
    [IMG]

    -J
  9. QuickCapri83 New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 5, 2004
    Message Count:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    North East, PA
    I dunno, all I can say is the X-Pipe has made a huge difference, I dont understand why. After 3k or so you can really start to tell the difference, and from 4k-6k it feels like a really good gain.

    Ehh Gtech could be off, no doubt, but there's certainly a huge gain in acceleration since the pipe, something i've never experienced with any of my 5.0's. Guess it's just something weird.
  10. 01Steeda New Member

    Member Since:
    May 30, 2005
    Message Count:
    754
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Baton Rouge, LA
    what mods do you have??? something isnt right if all you have is an x pipe and put down over 250hp.
  11. QuickCapri83 New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 5, 2004
    Message Count:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    North East, PA
    Just what's listed in sig, misc stuff isnt installed yet.
    Maybe the Gtech wasnt done properly. But anyways I can "feel" a huge difference in the top end, no idea why. It defonantly pulls harder than it should from just a pipe...I dunno. I cant explain why it runs like it does.
  12. QU!CK New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Message Count:
    148
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC

    That's not his graph ;)


    -J
  13. myponyrocks I have more billet on the Stang than most women ha

    Member Since:
    Apr 18, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,262
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    RAF Alconbury, United Kingdom
    I had a huge SotP gain and a loss of rubber on the tires after my prochamber install so who knows... yes the G-Tech isn't 100% but from most posts I'd say 90% close?
  14. BurningRubber Active Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Message Count:
    2,738
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    48

    Wow, wtf... maybe thats why my car is slow as ass by PI standards.
  15. hotmustang331 New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Message Count:
    3,038
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Bastrop,TX
    Yes O/R X :hail2: . Man made a HUGE difference! I know where your coming from :nice:
  16. Mike97gt it doe snot

    Member Since:
    Jan 26, 1999
    Message Count:
    12,475
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Location:
    the people's republic of massachusetts
    the G-tech is pretty accurate if you use your brain when using it..

    1. do not time going up hills or downhills no matter how slight.. This will throw the readings off..

    2. no times anywhere are going to be the same, small differences in weather will swing the times one way or another.

    I have used the newest model of the G-tech and I find it to be a great tool for practice at the track.. the only thing that is slightly off is the MPH becuase on the G-tech it's the MPH at the end of the 1/4 where at the track it's average MPH thru the trap.
  17. 01Steeda New Member

    Member Since:
    May 30, 2005
    Message Count:
    754
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Baton Rouge, LA

    then who's graph is it? I thought he presented it to be his:shrug:
  18. ZaC851 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    May 24, 2002
    Message Count:
    275
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Birmingham, AL
    Sorry buddy, you didnt gain 5mph from a simple midpipe upgrade, It aint happening. Go to the track. Then report back to us.
  19. 01BlkGT Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 22, 2002
    Message Count:
    1,016
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    ATX
    Well no one is disputing that the x-pipe is helping in the power dept. It will certainly help the engine in the upper rpm band not be so lazy. I'd say it is very likely to pick up 10-15rwhp from the x-pipe depending on how much leaner your car is running from the mod. I see you have BBK headers, short or long? What did you have before the x-pipe? If you really want to gain the full benefits from the x-pipe, get some gears....biggest SOTP difference you can do for the car other than power adders.
  20. QU!CK New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Message Count:
    148
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC

    :rlaugh:
    Go back and reread who posted the graph...lol, I was the one that posted it to show my gains from adding LT's, o/r X, and catback :D


    -J

Share This Page