94-95 Tail Lights VS. 96-98 Tail Lights?

  • Sponsors (?)


Hey!!your avatar is that fat **** star!!! :lol: I would stick with the horizontals, they don't necessarily say 5.0 since mine has them and its the slow six.: :nonono: As soon as i can though, I'm dropping a 302 in and getting the plate with 50 on it. :nice:
 
94 3.8l stang said:
Hey!!your avatar is that fat **** star!!! :lol: I would stick with the horizontals, they don't necessarily say 5.0 since mine has them and its the slow six.: :nonono: As soon as i can though, I'm dropping a 302 in and getting the plate with 50 on it. :nice:


Ron Germy..... Ooops, I mean Jeremy. That guy must have a 6 foot schlong, cause otherwise he's a fat ugly slob!
 
much like a lot of you, i had a revalation. but unfortunatly i had to put on clears before i realized. luckily i found some 94-95 on a wrecked car and got them for cheep. my vote is deffinatly for the horizontals. (oh..and i really gotta change my avatar pic)
 
Horzontals only....I've thought about changing a few times, but why? There's only 2 years of those model tails, in the future it's gonna say alot more than it does now :nice:

476639_14_full.jpg


Plus they look pretty mean in the dark, facing an M113 Queen Mary Armoured Personel Carrier. :lol:
 
the picture xr8d302 makes our stangs look mean, but I gotta be honest and say, that the vertical one, make our cars look more like a mustang (older mustang vertical, and newer vertical).
That's the only draw back, and I really hate how Intrepids have our style of lights.
 
My opinion on that though, is that if i wanted those taillights, I would have gone out and bought a 68, or an 01. Our taillights scream 94-95 and the power you can pull out of them.

As for the intrepid thing....now i'm gonna have to go look for an intrepid just to see this :mad:
 
Used to have a 95 V6 that I picked up toward the end of high school. I loved the car, it was fast to me looks awesome and had the Mustang Legacy. Most non Stang lovers barely notice the talilight difference, no doubt the 94-95 do look mean at night. Now having a 97 I like the vertical lights, cool tri-bar, jew-like and the shape goes with the curves in the body. I say keep what you have if you like and be happy.

The 94-95 light look pretty trick with sequentials
 
When I bought my car the previus owner had put on verticle tail lights, and everone i know likes them better. But i hate them. Everytime a 5.0 drives by me you can tell they dont respect my car becuse they think its a 4.6.. IT DRIVES ME NUTS. To the avergage person verticle look better during the day (including me) but the horazontal lights iare what puts are cars ahead of the 96+ cars.
 
thanks guys

i had a set of donor tailights that i removed the 3157 bulb opening from and then removed the outers of my good tail lights and plastic welded the donor 3157 bulb fittings in so now it has 3 bulbs and then i just wired the harness up and threw them in.
 
hahaha, the thread that just won't die...

Hey RC, good to see you're still kickin....

I was actually looking at your homepage yesterday to get a reference look at your rebels, i might be picking up a set
 
When I bought my car the previus owner had put on verticle tail lights, and everone i know likes them better. But i hate them. Everytime a 5.0 drives by me you can tell they dont respect my car becuse they think its a 4.6.. IT DRIVES ME NUTS. To the avergage person verticle look better during the day (including me) but the horazontal lights iare what puts are cars ahead of the 96+ cars.

:rlaugh:
 
I used to love the 94-95 tails when I got my car, I always defended them. A few years later now, I hate how dull they have gotten. I've tried everything to brighten them up. The design isn't all that bad, it's just most of these tails I see look old as crap. I think the 96-98s blacked out bezels look badass. Not so much when they're painted to match though.