Search results

3.90's anyone? Had Motive 3.90's for 4 years now and still great. Sometimes I wish I got 4.10's and sometimes I wish I got 3.73's .... its all about where and how you drive. But 3.90's are a great middle point.

quick question guys... i have a Mach1000 on my 2003 GT... i want to remove just the 2 subs and maybe the amp rack... (for a little while only due to space issues) what do i need to do to remove it? and will removing the subs and amps cause my stereo to not work?

Because Ford cant produce enough power to reach 1000hp.... hahah Bull****... you can take any ford motor and make 1000hp... for cheaper than buying a damn LS7 and adding turbos to it... i bet that car breaks down 10x becuase of the chevy stuff in there

i have had 3.90's for 2 years now... and they are fun but at times can be kind of a pain on the highway or even for cruising at certain speeds... i would never go bigger than 3.90's for my daily driver... i wish i had gone 3.73's..

If you need a walkthrough then you shouldnt be doing it on your own... pay the money and have it done by someone who knows what he is doing

Looks to me like he skid on top of the rail instead of jumping the whole way there... which would explain how he ended up backwards... no way he clears that jump backwards after hitting the concrete

I have the same problem... dont remember when it started... but it sbeen going on for a while It never actually fails to start... but 3-5 times out of the day the car cranks for a while before actually starting and it bothers me to no end... still dont know what the problem is...

dead even race till about 75-80 then the mach1 will pull up top

yea how about no..... a GT does not trap 109mph in the 1/4 how is it similar to racing a GT... its like .3-.4 slower than an srt-8 300c and traps like 104mph in the 1/4

well... the 340hp 300c hemi is good for low 14's at around 99mph the 425hp srt-8 300c weighs 4,250lbs and is good for low 13's at around 109mph... you re going to get beat by at least 2-3 cars.. it does 4.7 in the 0-60mph

Best documented time for a Ford GT STOCK = 11.3 @133mph Best documented time for ZO6 STOCK = 11.7-11.9@125-127mph STOCK none of this DR bull****.... give the Ford GT some DR's and see what happens.... its called MPH

i didnt beat him on the launch obviously... i passed him at 80mph... duh lol

well i got him from a stop... passed him at about 80mph... and then from a roll i walked him slowly... i expected more from a modded wrx:shrug: its my best friends car so i get to drive it as well... fun car to drive i might add just to clear things up... its an 02 WRX non-STi... 5 speed...

WRX 5 speed manual: Up pipe, down pipe, blow off valve, catback GT 5 speed manual: JLT intake, flows + 2 removed cats, 3.90's, short throw shifter (installing x-pipe soon) he claims the car put down 167awhp stock and now does 225awhp modded im thinking im probably going to need to install the...

price this price that.... hp this hp that... at the end of the day... flagship Ford GT vs flagship ZO6 .... FORD GT WINS.... thank you for playing Ford GT 550hp + Mid-Engine = endless potential ZO6 500hp = decent rwd sports car

a stock 99+ GT traps around 98mph and is capable of 100-101 stock... so even though its going to be tough for you your first time... you should be able to hit 13's with that mph however i dont think you will... i predict 14.4@97mph...

i dont care what the Ford GT costs.... its sexy... its MID-ENGINE... and its clearly faster anyway u slice it... and its always going to be more capable of faster times than the ZO6 due to the fact it is MID-ENGINE... just because a car costs less doesnt mean that it is better... ill take a...

FORD GT BONE STOCK with DR's will run low 10's at over 134mph.... whats ur point?

Mach 1's have put down more than 300rwhp with a mid pipe alone... add a catback and cai and i dont see why it cant hit 295rwhp... and mach 1 bone stock went 13.1 ...