Search results

  1. A

    Dyno Woes

    Really... :( Someone please tell me he's wrong. :D
  2. A

    Dyno Woes

    Ok, so my Dad went and got the Mustang dynoed at a place called Mustang Dynamometer, without me. :notnice: Anyway, when she put in the car's weight, my Dad told her 2200 ( I wish :D ) instead of about 3200. So my question to you guys is, can you estimate what the real HP and torque would be...
  3. A

    302 and 12 MPG...

    Ok, so my recently rebuilt 302 is getting horrible gas mileage (about 12 is the best I've had) on 2.70s and a rebuilt C4. 302 .030 over Edelbrock Performer Intake, Cam, Lifters, 650 CFM Carb ( All from a kit ) Pertronix Flamethrower I don't get it. :shrug:
  4. A

    hypereutectic pistons...

    so all (or most at least) pistons today are hypereutectic?
  5. A

    hypereutectic pistons...

    i'm really not sure what these are. the only difference i can find between them and cast iron is that they're made of some aluminum alloy or something...what are everybody's thoughts/opinions on these? does anybody have a link with some information about them? thanks
  6. A

    yes, another hp/torque estimation thread

    hmm, well what heads would you suggest?
  7. A

    yes, another hp/torque estimation thread

    yeah i know the heads aren't the best (probably the worst haha) but for now i'm not looking to make a beast :)
  8. A

    yes, another hp/torque estimation thread

    :) anyway, just wondering what kind of numbers you think this setup would produce in a 68 coupe 302 bored .030 over mac long tube headers dual exhaust, h-pipe, turbo mufflers stock heads from a 289 (were the 302 heads any different from 289 heads?) edelbrock performer intake, cam...