spidermaxx300
Founding Member
but you really havent given me any facts about the item at hand....the STI. sure you posted a link about the physics of racing, and it is very informative. although it still doesnt tell us, you , or me that the STI's wing has no function at all other than drag.
so if i told you Paul Hansen from www.apexjapan.com stated that driving the car back to back with and with out the wing on, on a road course the wing made a difference in handling and control......that would mean nothing?
my wrc statement was and is true there are many rally events where the cars will see some 100mph+ driving....on gravel, its only reasonable/logical to assume the wing does provide downforce. it does aid in it for sideways driving but dont you think that the egineneers took into acount the fact that they do have staightaways and slight bends. if you cant see this to be true then i really dont what to think. you will probably never find a website/article/documentation of the actual downforce beeing generated by a wrc or sti wing but it doesnt mean they dont produce downforce. rather it be 20lbs or 100lbs doesnt mean crapola.....because my argument remains it does produce some downforce. with that being said and seeing as how you cant prove the wing has no function and i am only limited to my information, (other then what prodrivers and SPT, SOA, Prodrive say) we will have to agree to disagree.
i merely posted the pic to show that a functional wing can be mounted to a trunck.....you even agreed that the wing is functional......you just doubt the downforce capabilities.....right? that was my point....the wing can be functional an be mounted to a trunk......which brings us back to the STI.we are not talking about F1 downforce here,obviously, something of that force would buckle the trunk lid, using your qoute the STI and WRC is limited to its capabilities, it doesnt say it wont or cant work, just that there are limitations . i dont know what to say other then that qoute from s.w.r.t said the wing "generates significant amount of downforce"....they must be lying and you should go be a wing designer.
i really dont know what else to tell you, other than i give up....cowardly or not, i dont care.....we are just stuck making 4 right turns.
you seem like a nice fellow and somewhat educated(to what degree i dont know), i think you should be able to understand why i edited my qoute about your 2MFF buddy. these types of debates dont need post like the ones he made. it got under my skin, so i edited my post to take it out after i thought about it, . apparently i wasnt quick enough.....you caught me.
regardless of his automotive achievements, his post were lacking in the info department......again thats why i edited it.... i try not to judge people.
quick question before i go..... i once did a frame off restoration of a 78 chevy 4x4(it looked just like the fall guy's without the eagle), i do autocrossing on occassion,i used to race karts, my 1/4 times in my scooby are quite impressive for my level of mods.......not to be a smart ass but does that make me knowledgeable.?
have a good one,
shaun h.
so if i told you Paul Hansen from www.apexjapan.com stated that driving the car back to back with and with out the wing on, on a road course the wing made a difference in handling and control......that would mean nothing?
my wrc statement was and is true there are many rally events where the cars will see some 100mph+ driving....on gravel, its only reasonable/logical to assume the wing does provide downforce. it does aid in it for sideways driving but dont you think that the egineneers took into acount the fact that they do have staightaways and slight bends. if you cant see this to be true then i really dont what to think. you will probably never find a website/article/documentation of the actual downforce beeing generated by a wrc or sti wing but it doesnt mean they dont produce downforce. rather it be 20lbs or 100lbs doesnt mean crapola.....because my argument remains it does produce some downforce. with that being said and seeing as how you cant prove the wing has no function and i am only limited to my information, (other then what prodrivers and SPT, SOA, Prodrive say) we will have to agree to disagree.
i merely posted the pic to show that a functional wing can be mounted to a trunck.....you even agreed that the wing is functional......you just doubt the downforce capabilities.....right? that was my point....the wing can be functional an be mounted to a trunk......which brings us back to the STI.we are not talking about F1 downforce here,obviously, something of that force would buckle the trunk lid, using your qoute the STI and WRC is limited to its capabilities, it doesnt say it wont or cant work, just that there are limitations . i dont know what to say other then that qoute from s.w.r.t said the wing "generates significant amount of downforce"....they must be lying and you should go be a wing designer.
i really dont know what else to tell you, other than i give up....cowardly or not, i dont care.....we are just stuck making 4 right turns.
you seem like a nice fellow and somewhat educated(to what degree i dont know), i think you should be able to understand why i edited my qoute about your 2MFF buddy. these types of debates dont need post like the ones he made. it got under my skin, so i edited my post to take it out after i thought about it, . apparently i wasnt quick enough.....you caught me.
regardless of his automotive achievements, his post were lacking in the info department......again thats why i edited it.... i try not to judge people.
quick question before i go..... i once did a frame off restoration of a 78 chevy 4x4(it looked just like the fall guy's without the eagle), i do autocrossing on occassion,i used to race karts, my 1/4 times in my scooby are quite impressive for my level of mods.......not to be a smart ass but does that make me knowledgeable.?
have a good one,
shaun h.