hrspwrjunkie
Member
- Dec 15, 2004
- 165
- 0
- 18
I wouldn't trust Desk Top Dyno for spit.
The runs are usually inaccurate as hell (it shows way more output than actually occurs, even when the motor is tuned correctly).
Fact of the matter is, the RPM does outperform the Performer on a lot of applications, but without a lot of experience assembling engine combinations, a pre-designed combination is going to be the most trouble free, and provided the assembly is tuned correctly (on a chassis dyno), it will provide the most trouble free (and more than likely the most) power an inexperienced engine designer/builder can find.
Ryan
The runs are usually inaccurate as hell (it shows way more output than actually occurs, even when the motor is tuned correctly).
Fact of the matter is, the RPM does outperform the Performer on a lot of applications, but without a lot of experience assembling engine combinations, a pre-designed combination is going to be the most trouble free, and provided the assembly is tuned correctly (on a chassis dyno), it will provide the most trouble free (and more than likely the most) power an inexperienced engine designer/builder can find.
Ryan
milner351 said:Unless you plan on doing some iterations with desk top dyno or the like, it's wise to do a package set up, or follow recomendations of the head manufacturer or the like.
Performer RPM with Performer RPM camshaft, and good cylinder heads will be a nice package for street / strip.