Greetings!
My name is Joe and I am new to your forum but not to the Mustang.
My first - 1969 Mach 1 in 1979, paid $500.00 for it. My second - 1971 Mach 1 in 1981, paid $500.00 for it as well. My third - 1965 Fastback in 2004, paid well, a lot more.... Anyway, I have been brewing about this for a while and thought I would share my thoughts. The Ford Motor Company should point out to Chevrolet that the Corvette advertising is misleading and down right untruthful regarding its consecutive production history. Last year, promoting the "50th" Anniversary of the longest running production muscle/sports car. In 1983 there was no corvette production -
it was the re-design year and was re-introduced in 1984, making the Mustang the most consecutive year production muscle/sports car, not the corvette. That's been bottled up for a while and I needed to share with the Blue Oval Nation.
Regards,
Joe
My name is Joe and I am new to your forum but not to the Mustang.
My first - 1969 Mach 1 in 1979, paid $500.00 for it. My second - 1971 Mach 1 in 1981, paid $500.00 for it as well. My third - 1965 Fastback in 2004, paid well, a lot more.... Anyway, I have been brewing about this for a while and thought I would share my thoughts. The Ford Motor Company should point out to Chevrolet that the Corvette advertising is misleading and down right untruthful regarding its consecutive production history. Last year, promoting the "50th" Anniversary of the longest running production muscle/sports car. In 1983 there was no corvette production -
it was the re-design year and was re-introduced in 1984, making the Mustang the most consecutive year production muscle/sports car, not the corvette. That's been bottled up for a while and I needed to share with the Blue Oval Nation.
Regards,
Joe