vristang said:
Grady,
I think you understand the C&L calibrations better than I do
I am pretty sure that is how things work.
I would not make any bets on that
My concern was the flow potential a 73mm tube.
Is 780 kg/hr the most that can flow through this tube?
After I tell you how I see all this maf stuff ... you, like other peeps who know me may say ... that guy peeps at life through a different keyhole than all the rest of us
but here are my thoughts never the less
You got volts and airflow (kg/hr) to work with. When working with the transfer curve, we mostly hose around with the flow values.
Lets say you have a wb to confirm true af ratio and you got a new combo.
You make a wot baseline run and see your too fat on the big end. You'll lower those flow values to lean things out. Just said that to show how those flow values can change btw
As for the voltage values ............
You can only work with 0 to 5. If you saw something close to 5 at max rpm from the baseline run, you know right off the bat, the maf is gonna need a recal. A + or - of 50 kg/hr ain't gonna change any of that
Of course, anything close to 5 before max rpm would be a pegging the maf kinda thing
If so, then there would be a hp limit of ~310 or so associated with that tube?
Could be
Anytime I see stuff like that, I've always felt like that stuff is a guess or ball park figure.
There is a limit as to how much air I can pull through a straw, so is 780 kg/hr the limit for pulling air through a 73mm opening?
Could be
Anytime I see stuff like that, I've always felt like that stuff is a guess or ball park figure.
This limit shouldn't be affected by shifting the scale of voltage vs airflow.
signed a confused noobie,
jason
Might be splitting hairs here but ...............
I see it as changing airflow for a given voltage. If I understand your Q correctly ... we talked about that above, so the answer is ... No
The whole X number of hp = X number of kg/hr thing is something I know can change based upon my limited experience is what I'm trying to say here.
How I see it all is
You use those formulas found on the C&L/ProM site as guide lines to pick a starting place OR baseline AND tweec to your liking
When talking about the C&L ...............
The electronics stays the same but the tube changes.
As I see it ... as the tube changes ... the transfer has to change.
Anybody feel free to jump in here and get involved
as I don't think I did too good of a job
in my attempt to get across what I'm trying to say
Grady