I have a 67 coupe thats going to get a 5.0L HO when I put it back together and I wanted to get the experts' opinions on the BBK SSI intake.
I searched, but there wasn't too much recent info here.
My goals with the engine build are not all out power. I'll be happy with 300rwhp and I would like something a little different looking than the standard intake design.
I read the comparison in the June 06 MM&FF, where they dyno'ed the BBK against a ported Cobra intake, and the BBK made marginally more (12hp and 5lb-ft). Peak numbers for the BBK on the mustang dyno were 268rwhp and 300 lb-ft, but they were possibly limited by using ported stock heads. I hadn't decided yet, but I was thinking of going with a set of 2.02/1.60 Edelbrock performers (unless that will create PTV clearance issues with 1.7 rockers and a stock bottom end).
Anyways, Im not afraid to spend a little more on the BBK intake if I get decent performance and the uniqueness. So months after this thing came out, does anyone have new opinions or first hand knowledge of the overall quality of the BBK SSI?
Thanks
-Andrew
I searched, but there wasn't too much recent info here.
My goals with the engine build are not all out power. I'll be happy with 300rwhp and I would like something a little different looking than the standard intake design.
I read the comparison in the June 06 MM&FF, where they dyno'ed the BBK against a ported Cobra intake, and the BBK made marginally more (12hp and 5lb-ft). Peak numbers for the BBK on the mustang dyno were 268rwhp and 300 lb-ft, but they were possibly limited by using ported stock heads. I hadn't decided yet, but I was thinking of going with a set of 2.02/1.60 Edelbrock performers (unless that will create PTV clearance issues with 1.7 rockers and a stock bottom end).
Anyways, Im not afraid to spend a little more on the BBK intake if I get decent performance and the uniqueness. So months after this thing came out, does anyone have new opinions or first hand knowledge of the overall quality of the BBK SSI?
Thanks
-Andrew