Here is my cam card http://www.crower.com/misc/cam_spec/cam_finder.php?part_num=15237&x=39&y=6
I have a 351W
I have a 351W
jerry S said:Here is my cam card http://www.crower.com/misc/cam_spec/cam_finder.php?part_num=15237&x=39&y=6
I have a 351W
1966conv said:That's an open ended question without knowing the rest of your components. (ie heads, intake, carb, exhaust)
LMan said:what valve springs?
jerry S said:I have edelbrock rpm performer cylinder heads, an edelbrock rpm air gap, and a holley 650 cfm 4bbl with an electric fuel pump and fuel pressure regulator, long tube headers, and a 2.5 inch dual exhaust.
HistoricMustang said:With a 351 that is pretty close. For a 289 add 300 to 400 more RPM's before the PULLING will stop with a stock bottom end. (Yes, they will rev higher)
HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
86bluecobra said:if you upgrade the springs in the heads it should pull longer. the dual plane intake doesn't help either for wanting to pull higher. my 351w pulls more then 5900rpm (propably just a few hundred rpm more)i have a stealth dual plane intake and holley systemax II heads. i shift around 6500rpm at track. i also have a 750 holley and 150 hp shot of juice so it seems to pull better on the juice.
69Rcode_Mach1 said:I agree that sounds about right Jerry. A 351 will not spin as high as the smaller displacement engines, and 5900 is not bad at all. It would put your shift points around 6300-6400 depending on how fast the curve drops off.
jerry S said:I am ignorant as to my shift points. I figured that since my engine stops making power at 5900, I would just put in a 6K rev limiter in there. Why would I shift at 6300-6400 when I am out of my power band? Or is that exactly what you want to do? I have no idea so please educate me.