Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech' started by trans am, Dec 6, 2003.
P.S. hey mods do us a favor
I've had way too much fun with this one but I couldn't agree more that it should be locked!!!
they really need to add that smiley
LOL, this guy is a loser. First he says he has a T/A, then it's a 2000 GT. I think he is lying about both cars.
FYI Trans am the 70's to 92' F-bodies were complete trash as well. At least when the fox mustangs came out they were pretty decent by 85' and they were kicking the **** out of f-bodys until 93. Actually back then the F-bods sucked so bad they had to pit the Fox mustang against the Corvette for a number of years...and it beat the vette in many tests too. But I don't blame you since you were most likely too young to remember. As for the years after 93 it's all a matter of taste. F-bodies are nice cars no doubt but I have never liked the looks. They have always costed more (too much if you ask me) and the insurance rates on them are as much as a Corvette. For the same money, people buy less expensive Mustangs that have as much mod potential as any F-Body. GM cut the platform because they were losing lots of money on them and they weren't selling many.
You are only here to try to make people angry...many...many people that would have no problem waxing your ass in any race...
Think about it.
I don't know about that. I don't think there will ever be a more perfect time to use it...
I believe this one also applies
What a f a g.
oh man ive never laughed so hard in weeks
Last time I checked they had.....MACH 1.
I along with over 50 other members that modded their car heavily and / or have superchagers to back them up, will take you on any day mr. trans am.
Now that is just good clean fun!!! (Ok, maybe not real clean).
We need one of a Mustang doing a breakstand on his head...
Trans am quoted
"I'm still waiting for my V-tech to come in the mail"