ok, am just considering buying one of these as a stopgap until we decide what aftermarket ecu to run, and for the life of me, I just can't justify getting a RT model, purely because I consider the datalogging function to be not terribly helpful when I think about it -
1. There's no knock sensor on the ecu to monitor
2. IDC/IPW is easy enough to calculate without the need for a log
3. the factory o2's aren't accurate at all, and tweecer wouldn't support wideband o2's would it?
4. This leaves MAS/MAF voltage - which also doesn't really need logging
All our tuning is done on a Dyno anyway, with external sensors - so the logging becomes more or less irrelevant since all the dyno info is stored and printed out for us.
Is there something I'm missing? We used to datalog our Mitsubishi's all the time, but that was purely because we could monitor the factory knock sensor...
1. There's no knock sensor on the ecu to monitor
2. IDC/IPW is easy enough to calculate without the need for a log
3. the factory o2's aren't accurate at all, and tweecer wouldn't support wideband o2's would it?
4. This leaves MAS/MAF voltage - which also doesn't really need logging
All our tuning is done on a Dyno anyway, with external sensors - so the logging becomes more or less irrelevant since all the dyno info is stored and printed out for us.
Is there something I'm missing? We used to datalog our Mitsubishi's all the time, but that was purely because we could monitor the factory knock sensor...