Earl,
Understood. I just want to make sure that individuals also remember statistics and the probability of getting a bad car. I want to ensure that the Mustang branding is not generalized as a POS. The SN197 is a technological advancement over the SN95.
The problem here is that the demand for this vehicle is higher than their production capabilities. Let's say Ford can produce on their production line in Flat Rock 1,000 cars in a week (hypothetical for simplicity). Now we have dealers and internet purchases requesting 2,000 per week. As a company trying to meet demand in this modern day, what are my options? Not fill demand or cut corners? Well, I am going to cut corners where I deem it "acceptable" to meet demand and worry about the issues later. So, we have 2 bell housing bolts instead of 4 - we have carpet cut too low on the floor board, gaskets and parts that have been rejected by QC being used anyway because to reorder will take two weeks longer and halt production.
I am not saying this is right. I do not agree with it. It is not living by the product branding of "Quality is Job 1". It is the simple and shear fact and reality of what has happened with the demand of the vehicle. Ford isn't making good choices. Given. Are all 05 Stangs POS. NO. I bought mine early in the production runs (November 2004) and am TOTALLY HAPPY even with the issues and very loud brakes..
Unfortunately, Ford will take some heat from this. There will be Stang owners who convert after production issues have frustrated them to no end. But, their bet is that, like myself, we will buy the car, deal with the issues as they are worked out and keep it for a long time. Better than not being able to meet production and losing the initial sale to Chevy, BMW, Nissian or someone else.
I just hope this works out for everyone.
Jennifer