Wingless GT pics

Discussion in '2005 - 2009 Specific Tech' started by detmack81, Jan 19, 2004.

  1. I want one without a wing. I think it looks a lot better on the current model as well.
  2. I agree with this guy:

  3. I think that it looks good with as well as without the wing.

    I prefer to have the wing though. It looks less like a regular sportsroof Mustang and more like a retro Mustang with the wing. The rear end of the 2005 resembles the 69-70 Mustang. And the rear ends of the 69-70 Mustangs looked much nicer with the rear spoiler wing on them. That's just my opinion though.
  4. Agreed. Although pre-05 Stangs + Wingless = :drool:
  5. Ok, this is the second time I've seen you say the 2005 looks like the 69-70, and I'm totally not seeing it, so can you explain why you think it looks like the 69-70? Most of what I see is similarities to the 65-66 fastback.
  6. how could anyone refer to that wing as a "gawky, J.C. Whitney-looking wing." Its not like they used a Lancer Evo wing...

    It doesnt NEED a wing to speak "power," but I think it looks nice either way, and to each his own.
  7. Because it looks like a tacked-on afterthought. It's just not very well integrated with the rest of the car.

    I think the EVO wing is tacky but at least it's functional.
  8. Look at the rear end of the 2005 Mustang. Stand in the back of the car and look directly at the rear tail lights and at the rear facia of the car. The rear facia and tail lights on the 2005 look exactly like the 60 and 70 Mustang.

    What you are referring to that looks like a 66 fastback is the side view of the 2005 Mustang. Especially with the triangular window which is the same styling like the 65 and 66 Mustang Fastback. But the rear facia looks like the 69 and 70 Mustang fastback.