Would you like a more powerful GT? Would you sacrfice the V8 engine for it?

Prefferred engine:

  • 300bhp 4.6 V8

    Votes: 155 90.6%
  • 350bhp 2.0 Turbo 4 cylinder

    Votes: 16 9.4%

  • Total voters
    171

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
With lots of talk that Ford didn't offer enough power with the new GT, here's an option that could well have been a reality (similar options where once considered in the early 1990's).

Would you rather have a:

1. 300bhp/320lb ft 4.6 V8 as per the current lineup

or

2. 2.0 litre 16v Turbo 4 cylinder with 350bhp/360lb ft


Such an engine already exists in the form of the 2.0 Ford ZeeTec which in mild turbo form produced 220bhp for the Focus RS, however this engine also appears destined for the forthcoming Cosworth Focus with 330-350bhp.
 
  • Sponsors (?)


I 've owned two SVO's and they are fun as hell, but I believe the Mustang should have a V8 and keep it. A speciality car however would not bother me, but I think a 6 cylinder(w/turbo) would be a better choice because of the cars weight.

Thanks Mike
 
not in the mustang, but as a focus owner i have to say the idea of a ford turbo 4 making that much HP gives me wood.

they should bring it over either in a SE focus or in some other model like the Aussie Falcon. God that car is sexy!

oh, and 4 cyl does not equal rice. fartcans, bodykits installed bot not painted, excessive neon (or any neon for that matter), or mods that make for no performance but look like they should equal rice. please get it right.

Mike
 
whiteboyslo said:
oh, and 4 cyl does not equal rice. fartcans, bodykits installed bot not painted, excessive neon (or any neon for that matter), or mods that make for no performance but look like they should equal rice. please get it right.

Mike


I agree, but what about these 3/4 scoops for the stang? Is this ricing it out? Scoops there generally cool the rear brakes when functional, but all you're doing with a stang is taping on some shaped urethane. Just curious what you guys think.
 
Didn't they already try a Turbo I-4 for Stangs, weren't they more pricey and didn't sell that much back then, why would they now? The modular V8s are much cheaper to produce and use in Mustangs (the whole point of the Modular engine family line) then building a limited highly tuned high HP turbo 4 banger. If they're gonna stop making a high horsepower Mustang that is not a V8 they should just build something else which they tried with the Ford Probe back in the late 80's to mid 90's, which was supposed to be the Mustang replacement, everyone cried out and we all know what eventually happened with that car. Afterall the Mustangs main selling point is not power, it's only part of the equation. Mustangs are cars for everyone. :flag:
 
i have a svt focus right now (06 GT on order) and a 350hp turbo motor would be awesome in the foci. One of the main reasons i am switching back to the stang though is cause i miss my V8. There is nothing like the growl of a nice V8. I ..miss...*sniffle*...it. But will have it again soon.