5.0ina66 said:If you're going 4x disc, use an MC for an 85 Continental w/ Hydroboost..identical to the elusive SVO aluminum MC, looks stock and doesn't cost a fortune like the JMC setup (but you lose the major cool factor!)
Yes, I'm planning on a NON-power 4x disk setup. Cobras in the front and explorers in the rear. Is the Continental MC going to work for a NON-power setup?
Jimmys66 said:I was buying it for the cool factor also. Got any picks of the Continental unit?
Pbum5 said:here is apic of an SVO unit.
$24 at local parts store w/ $10 core charge not bad.
I also have a non-power 4 disc setup
mdjay said:I'm switching it because I need a power brake set-up. I have a very quick car that needs to be just as responsive to stop.
The manual set-ups require too much foot/time to push it down and I don't have that time with this car. Plus I'm getting old, lazy and weak
The two biggest arguments for using the JMC (in my opinion) is that they look great and you don't have to use a proportioning valve for bias.CornerCarvin67 said:Okay.. I'm trying to get educated here I guess. The pedal pressure I have in there now is hard. I understand that the power booster gives you braking power with less pedal effort. But does it actually help ultimately clamp the brakes harder? I mean... it's all about fluid pressure, right? So why would the JMC master cylinder clamp any better than a typical dual bowl master cylinder if it's not power assisted? Is there something I'm missing here? I don't care how hard I have to push the brake pedal... I just want optimum caliper clamping force on my rotors.... does that make sense?? Does the bore size off the MC effect anything?