Methodical said:Are the LTs emission legal? This is something to think about if you have emissions (i.e. the visual test). I don't know-just a thought.
EN7 said:If I went with long tubes, wouldn't I have to swap out my x pipe?
That perfectly illustrates the stereotype for each class of header. Thanks for the data.TrickStang37 said:I lost all my dyno data, but basically the shorties made a tiny bit more low end <3400rpm AND top end >4800rpm while the equal lengths made a tiny bit more from 3400-4800 but on average from 3000-5400 they were the same. as for the longtubes, i made the same exact power with the equal lengths vs the longtubes except the longtubes made about 30 rwtq more at 3000rpm but that advantage was gone by 4200rpm or so and hp was the same after.
i didnt really get it, was that a bash?? i dont own that car anymore (sold it last month) and the computer i had with all my data and racing formulas and such crashed and everything was lost.GRGT1994 said:That perfectly illustrates the stereotype for each class of header. Thanks for the data.
SWYZ721 said:would it be worth the $300 to switch to un-equals?
SeventyMach1 said:The BBK LT's are $279.88. Again .... $100 more for the ceramic ones.
Last time I inquired ... they cost a little less than regular mid-pipes.SWYZ721 said:A new mid-pipe, how much does those cost?
Yep. EDIT: I guess you can re-route them.02 extenders?
Unless you swapped to a 4.6 .... you will never need them.I don't have the MIL eliminators and I am not getting a CEL, would I need one with LTs?
Yep. A little. Maybe someone who has lowered their car and has LT's will also chime in to give their first hand experience.Don't I also compromise ground clearance, if I wanted to lower the car?