05 dyno sheet

Discussion in '2005 - 2009 Specific Tech' started by powershots, Dec 15, 2004.

Page 1 of 2

  1. powershots Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 16, 2001
    Message Count:
    331
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    don't know if any have been posted here but I thought I would share it. car was red 5 speed. has potential. I posted it here on another thread BTW. Now open for discussion and bashing LOL peace.

    :nice:

    [IMG]
    powershots, Dec 15, 2004
    #1

  2. Befast Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 30, 2000
    Message Count:
    981
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Florida
    I must be getting old because I can't make out clearly what the HP/TQ is..

    B.
    Befast, Dec 15, 2004
    #2

  3. powershots Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 16, 2001
    Message Count:
    331
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    second run 269hp/283tq hope that helps. first run was 262/279 will reshoot it tonite. clearer.
    powershots, Dec 15, 2004
    #3

  4. Scott_B "1 Arm Wonder! "

    Member Since:
    Oct 27, 1998
    Message Count:
    4,254
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    NS Canada!
    wow does the torque ever fall off on these cars in the upper rpms!
    Scott_B, Dec 15, 2004
    #4

  5. romans8:28 New Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Message Count:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ouch......... nothing on top
    romans8:28, Dec 15, 2004
    #5

  6. TomServo92 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Message Count:
    559
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    Does anyone have a stock '04 GT dyno sheet to compare to the '05? That's the comparison I'd like to see. We know peak HP/TQ is better on '05 but I'm curious how the curves compare.
    TomServo92, Dec 15, 2004
    #6

  7. romans8:28 New Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Message Count:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    this is supposed to be from an 04...........

    http://www.mustangsacrossamerica.com/refs/dyno4.jpg
    romans8:28, Dec 16, 2004
    #7

  8. JonJon Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Message Count:
    4,923
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    back in Marylands
    seriously. wtf is up with that??
    JonJon, Dec 16, 2004
    #8

  9. 351CJ New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Message Count:
    1,769
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nice dyno comparison.

    05 45 more HP & 32 more lb ft, nice! :nice: :nice: :nice:

    HP doesn't start rolling off until 6,000 RPM on the '05, vs 5,200 for the '04.

    I bet cams will do wonders for the '05 - 3V. Keep in mind the cams are lifted out of the F-150 engine, so they're not designed for high end power. Based on the head flow #'s (link was posted here a couple months ago) the 3V heads should be good past 6,500 RPM.

    OK aftermarket companies. Who's going to be the first to offer 3V cams?
    351CJ, Dec 17, 2004
    #9

  10. TomServo92 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Message Count:
    559
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    OK, so the '05 has a much better top end than the '04 plus more peak power all for slightly more $$$ than ' 04. Why is everyone bashing it? It sounds like a winner to me.
    TomServo92, Dec 17, 2004
    #10

  11. Scott_B "1 Arm Wonder! "

    Member Since:
    Oct 27, 1998
    Message Count:
    4,254
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    NS Canada!
    But look at the torque! at 6G its less then 125 ftlbs. i hope that has to do with the TB issue.
    Scott_B, Dec 17, 2004
    #11

  12. TomServo92 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Message Count:
    559
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    The '04 chart doesn't continue to 6K. Does anyone know what the TQ is at 6K on the '04? I'm just trying to compare what we had vs. what we have now.
    TomServo92, Dec 17, 2004
    #12

  13. kirkyg Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 15, 2002
    Message Count:
    3,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Location:
    Beaumont, TX
    That graph is extremely skewed. Look at the torque numbers...it only drops from 280 to 210.

    kirkyg
    kirkyg, Dec 17, 2004
    #13

  14. kirkyg Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 15, 2002
    Message Count:
    3,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Location:
    Beaumont, TX
    no its not...read the right side of the graph for the torque number...left side for hp.

    kirkyg
    kirkyg, Dec 17, 2004
    #14

  15. TomServo92 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Message Count:
    559
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    You're right! It looks like about 230 @ 6K.
    TomServo92, Dec 17, 2004
    #15

  16. oilypushrod New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 12, 2004
    Message Count:
    65
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    the graph is surprising b/c it looks like HP peaks at 4500rpm then totally dumps after 5k.
    oilypushrod, Dec 17, 2004
    #16

  17. TomServo92 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Message Count:
    559
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    I think you're looking at the TQ curve not the HP curve (unless I'm reading it wrong?)
    TomServo92, Dec 17, 2004
    #17

  18. Stangbang -Alien-

    Member Since:
    Jul 12, 1999
    Message Count:
    3,569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Long Beach, Ca

    Exactly, it's at about 238 at 6000 rpm..
    Stangbang, Dec 17, 2004
    #18

  19. Scott_B "1 Arm Wonder! "

    Member Since:
    Oct 27, 1998
    Message Count:
    4,254
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    NS Canada!
    yeah, noticed that after i posted it. Thanks!
    Scott_B, Dec 17, 2004
    #19

  20. rhumbline Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 14, 2002
    Message Count:
    74
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's why I'd love to see a 4V version of the 4.6 return to the lineup! Very good numbers nonetheless.
    rhumbline, Dec 17, 2004
    #20
Page 1 of 2

Share This Page