No, and I never claimed it ran 12s...just consistent 13.6os...where did you see that I said 12s? I must've missed it-oh wait, I know why-I didn't type that...like I said, it was mid 90s, and I was only a teenager barely able to keep gas (edit: or tires) in my Mustang, let alone afford a video camera. Now, just like the editor further up said, if it were gutted with better
suspension, then yeah, I believe Tommy could've pulled it off...but I think he sold the car before he got married.
While I understand people come on here all the time and spew forth mountains worth of bovine excrement, I'm not one of those people, I have better things to do than berate my own integrity-lose my temper, yea sure, but what I saw with my own eyes is kinda burned there. I've owned my car literally half my life, have been involved with some good people, some not so good. I've rebuilt, or built about a dozen engines-mostly 5.0s or derivatives...nothing as fancy as I'm sure the likes of you guys have assembled, but what I don't really care for is someone calling me a liar, or using that line "where's the video?" I never laid claim to such a statement...just sayin' that's what I've seen...his was the quickest Fox Mustang that I'd call stock. Never said it was spectacular or something to write home about...just an observation.
I responded directly to you because you sound like that guy in the room who's always the cynic...that's your prerogative I guess...but, if I tell you I saw it, I'm not bs'ing you...or anyone else in here.