I saw this video and I thought I would post it what do you guys think?
YouTube - 2008 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 vs. 2008 Ford Shelby GT500KR
YouTube - 2008 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 vs. 2008 Ford Shelby GT500KR
12.8 1/4 mile time? I'm running that with bolt ons ....
Also, 4.9 second 0-60 MPH? A bone stock GT has a 0-60 time of 5.2 seconds........
the vette will outperform the mustang, no question. but i would still get the mustang. why? bc i'm a mustang guy. i dont need all that performance. if anything i would mod it for the 1/4 mile, but i dont care about auto cross or road racing, going straight is all that matters to me.
True, but the KR is heavy as all get out. Its all about power to weight ratio, and the ratio on a KR is really not that much better than a GT.
My reaction to video was... "Well Duh!" Sometimes these car review mags/videos are just trying to kill time. Everyone knew what the outcome was going to be, the KR is a collectable Muscle Car, and the Corvette is a sport car. They started the video and said, there is no history of a rivalry, because there is no rivalry, because they are in different market niches.
These auto review sites are stuck in a bit of a rut. They always run the same tests, it is formulaic. I am not saying that is all bad, but you have to see when the tests are somewhat irrelevant, like sending a 4x4 on a quarter mile. Its sorta cool, but you'd better not buy a 4x4 based on quarter mile performance. A KR for example, does not do so well in the solemn. That would be important if you were buying a KR as a track car, but no one does. People buy the KR to keep as a collectable, or, to do burnouts around town. That is why it has 500+ hp attached to skinnier tires. It is a burnout machine, pure and simple. Look good and smoke the tires. Solemn runs are irrelevant.
They should have done a test where they did burnout in font of some hot models and seen which driver the models then wanted to hang out with. That is a test I would like to see. I dont know the outcome already. The corvette might win, but my money is on the KR.
I could start the video with a corvette and a escalade as well. "There is no historical basis for the rivalry, but when you compare the two, they are both 80k and have V8s... etc."
Most people criticize the mustang for archaic suspension and an underpowered v8. I read the reviews, listened to the critics, and then I drove one after considering a GTi (turbo 4), a WRX (turbo 4), and a Mazdaspeed 3 (turbo 4). There is something about the mustang that these other cars don't have. The v8 sound is visceral and connects with you. 300 horsepower with with rear wheel drive is a great way to do a proper sports car. I wouldn't trade the live axle, rough ride, choppy shifter and noise for anything else on the road. I hate to get all philosophical and ****, but its true. If you don't understand the mustang after driving one maybe you're a ricer (just kidding), the car isn't for you and we get it.
Ford's been an easy target for years with the mustang too, always under-powering it compared to the latest offerings. My argument is that a true enthusiast will make the car perform. The aftermarket on these cars is awesome, no two mustangs are alike because they are built for modders like everyone on this board. I can't help but think that some of these lop-sided reviews are written by guys that have had their ass handed to them by a cobra or two.
my .02
No doubt. 114.6mph tells me that 1/4 run should be a LOT lower. Methinks this test was skewed. And 4.9 0-60? no way.12.8? I guess Ms. Daisy must have been driving herself around that day.
If you listen to the video you notice that in almost every clip the driver of the KR is just laying into the rev limiter like it is a video game. Not sure he had a clue how to manage traction. Probably the reason for the terrible 0-60 and 1/4 mile times. Just a thought I had.