cylinder head question

Discussion in '2.3L (N/A & Turbo)' started by glorkar, Aug 24, 2006.

  1. glorkar New Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 11, 2002
    Message Count:
    109
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What exactly is the difference between the 2.3 turbo head and the 2.3 n/a head?
  2. white1989 New Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 1, 2005
    Message Count:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hardened Valves, chamber is different. Oil feed line.
  3. Red_LX Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need por

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 1998
    Message Count:
    10,471
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Actually the oil feed line comes off a distribution block that threads into the 1/4" NPT hole at the back of the head...and this hole is on both heads, so that isn't really a difference.

    To explain it a little more...n/a heads have a "closed" chamber (heart shaped) where the turbo heads have an "open" chamber (D-shaped). The turbo heads also have hardened valve seats on the exhaust side, and the valves are better. Other than that they're basically identical.
  4. glorkar New Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 11, 2002
    Message Count:
    109
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thanks for the info.
  5. SMOKEDYA Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 13, 2003
    Message Count:
    3,604
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    56
    So do the turbo heads give you any power advantages over a n/a head? peace



    john:p
  6. Brantley Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 29, 2000
    Message Count:
    1,335
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A turbo head will give you power only on a turbo engine (well, in most cases). With lower compression on the turbo 2.3, you can crank the boost into the 20ish+ range. Turbo with a N/A head, 10-12psi is about all you're going to get.

    To see the differences in the chamber design, check out http://www.binaryweb.com/fordtech/cyl_head_bowl/index.asp
  7. SMOKEDYA Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 13, 2003
    Message Count:
    3,604
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    56
    cool thnks man! where abouts in memphis are you? I used to live in bartlet. peace




    john:p
  8. glorkar New Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 11, 2002
    Message Count:
    109
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Isn't 12lbs the stock boost on a turbo?
  9. Pro-Hawk New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 5, 2003
    Message Count:
    990
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    The SVO's came stock at 15psi... I forget when the T3 runs out but I want to say around the 20-22psi range.
  10. bhuff30 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Message Count:
    5,751
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    78
    pffft. Anyone ever calculated the actual difference in compression between the NA heads and the turbo heads?
    The difference is minimal, and on a 9.0:1 NA engine, the turbo head will drop you to around 8.7:1. The turbo head flows a bit better, so you can expect a bit more top end (only sightly less pathetic) and possibly a little less torque everywhere else.

    On the other hand, an NA head on a turbo engine will get you from 8.0:1 to 8.3:1. That alone won't make the difference between running 20psi and 12 psi. Simply not true. Heck, I milled my NA head, and was running probably 9.5:1 compression and still getting away with 12-14 psi of boost. lol.

    Most of the difference in compression is from the dished pistons of the turbo engine.

Share This Page