Damn, look at this thing!

Discussion in '2.3L Mustang Talk' started by Red_LX, Jan 18, 2006.

  1. Red_LX Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need por

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 1998
    Message Count:
    10,471
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    78
  2. Keasbey New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 12, 2003
    Message Count:
    928
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Damn! what A nice car!


    With some luck her new owner will become a TF member.. or a Stangnet new member! :S

    Aww I found some insparation for my car! :p
  3. mr_woodster New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Message Count:
    1,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Guess its all in taste, not a real fan of the body/kit/hood/color. Has some fancy stuff under floor pan though, 3 link with a panhard it looks like
  4. SpectralSamurai New Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 23, 2003
    Message Count:
    105
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Shyte! That's 2.3? Man... I'm with Woodster on the bodykit, but I like the color. Looks like it would have killer handling. Is that some sort of guard underneath the driveshaft? Looks like the car was built with either a road course or maybe even rally in mind after seeing that thing.
  5. snake109 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Message Count:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i like it all exept the color and that metal looking trim in the front
  6. Red_LX Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need por

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 1998
    Message Count:
    10,471
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    78
    I'm curious as to what the hell that thing with the rod ends on it is, up under the k-member. Sure doesn't look like anything I've ever seen.
  7. mr_woodster New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Message Count:
    1,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Looks like it just a sabilizer for the lift, keeps the car from tiping foward. My life doesnt have one, but look at it, its not part of the car.:)
  8. GREYFOX4INCH New Member

    Member Since:
    May 9, 2005
    Message Count:
    215
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    all i have to say is, why???
    i mean i guess i know why but $40,000....
    in a 2.3 those cars can be verry fast for way less money
    its kinda ugly too just my opinion.
  9. Stinger Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 7, 2001
    Message Count:
    7,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Did anyone notice the big "Huber Performance" logo on the windshield?

    That K-member brace isn't part of the lift...it's attached to the car.
  10. Red_LX Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need por

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 1998
    Message Count:
    10,471
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Looks to me like most of that $40K went into paint, suspension, and wheels & tires.
  11. 16vstang New Member

    Member Since:
    Oct 9, 2004
    Message Count:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The motor doesnt look like a slouch though ither, not 40k good though but good:)
  12. Stinger Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 7, 2001
    Message Count:
    7,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The motor does look damn nice. He's only got 42lb injectors though...I bet it's not making more than 330rwhp.

Share This Page