general 2.3 mustang reliaility

Discussion in '2.3L Mustang Talk' started by snake109, Jan 12, 2006.

  1. snake109 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Message Count:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Austin TX
    like the topic sais. im looking at a stock 92 hatchback 5sp with 130K miles. a/c works, doesnt leak oil and looks prety clean. I dont know about the 4 banger mustangs so i figure the best place to find out is here. I would be driving this car for the next 2 years and im mechanically knolageble and can perform most automobile work. so about how much trouble can i expect from this car? Also im going to go look at it again today so what specifically should i inspect on it if anything? Thanks guys.
  2. SVO1 Lord of The somethin' somethin' somethin', hell, I

    Member Since:
    Oct 25, 1999
    Message Count:
    4,598
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Lord of uh, hmm what was it again?
    a 2.3 With a 5 speed is as reliable as one can get.
    My old 88 beater had 112k on it when I bought it, and 221k on it when I sold it.
    They are cheap to maintain/drive.
    Go for it, you will be happy!
  3. Stinger Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 7, 2001
    Message Count:
    7,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Wilson, KS
    Agreed...
  4. Jacob07 New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Missouri
    Well mine is nearing 50k and its already caused me a lot of trouble. Mine sat for a long time though. I've heard plenty of stories about how reliable they are so I would say you should be ok.
  5. TMX New Member

    Member Since:
    May 24, 2005
    Message Count:
    225
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Houston
    My 93 sits alot, but still fires up when I want it to. With a 92, if the tach ever starts reading half and you have a code 223/224, check your coil packs and ICM. They seem to be going right now on 91-93s.
    Other than that, it'll run and keep going. Keep it maintained and it'll keep you going.
  6. snake109 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Message Count:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Austin TX
    well i picked it up, not the 92 hatchback though, they sold that one this morning. But a quick on-line check and i found a 93 2.3 sedan 5sp. This one actually looks in better shape, 140,xxx miles. new alternater and batter with other new parts in the past 6 years or so. runs great, i couldnt find any oil leaks on the engine and tranny worked great. paid $1,600 for her, was that too much? ill get it cleaned up and post some pics later. but i was suprised about that engine, 105hp doesnt sound like much but it pulls harder than any other 4-banger ive driven.
  7. Red_LX Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need por

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 1998
    Message Count:
    10,498
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
    You're probably feeling the 2.3's good bottom end grunt. 2.3 n/a's are great down low (135 ft-lb of torque at 3000 rpm), but not so great up top.
  8. rd Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 12, 2000
    Message Count:
    3,288
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    58
    Location:
    Ocean Springs MS
    For whatever reason, I really like the 2.3 engines. I have two 5.0 cars and one 2.3 Notch for my daughter. That is a really nice, relaxing and comfortable car to drive. It showed 136k when we bought it, but it seems to be going on its second high school tour strong.

Share This Page