honeslty why!?!?!?

Discussion in '2.3L (N/A & Turbo)' started by slow88stang, Feb 24, 2004.

  1. 91_4ourBanger New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Message Count:
    263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    if the Ford GT didnt win LeMans then i will garauntee you that this car would not be going into production again. and millions of dollars on a car program isnt as much as you think. nowadays companys spend hundred of millions, sometimes close to a billion dollars to make cars.
  2. Crovax Type O Danzigative the Dark

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Message Count:
    5,493
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Vinland
    OMFG!
    I'm retarded for walking when I can get my free rascal!
    Faster is bigger is more bestest!
  3. 91_4ourBanger New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Message Count:
    263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ?
  4. 89Stang Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Message Count:
    4,174
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    St.Louis, Mo
    the 2.3 is a good motor and yes more 2.3's were made than V8's its basically what saved the mustang. Its a good motor. Slow yes but hard to kill. The rest of the car goes bad before the motor does. lol
    As for V8 gas mileage my 5.0 5 spd convertible 89 GT managed 28mpg on the highway with 87 octane... not bad...
  5. kiddiccarus New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2003
    Message Count:
    1,298
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    RCA DOME/Aisle 328/Row 3/ Seats 4 and 5 or Bardsto
    :bang:
  6. Jaice New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Message Count:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If you think your 2.3 is slow, why not turbo swap it, or get a 302?

    Anyway, any one know why Ford stopped making the 2.3 in 94? I personally think they made a few prototypes with the 2.3 in the SN95 Body, but it was too slugish, so they decided to bring back the 3.8, but I know thats not the truth.
  7. Ray III New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 10, 2004
    Message Count:
    604
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
    The 2.3 could easily have made 120-150hp N/A with a decent head and cam, they were just scared to improve on an engine they only wanted for emissions.
  8. 89Stang Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Message Count:
    4,174
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    St.Louis, Mo
    2.3 didnt really die into around 2000-2002 somewhere in there I think....

    It lived on as a 2.3 and a 2.5 in the rangers but wasnt really enough motor to move the heavier SN95's... hell my 2.3 would keep up with auto 95-98 3.8's! Sad!
  9. Ray III New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 10, 2004
    Message Count:
    604
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
    To this day Ford still builds that 2.3 motor, unless they quit very recently. The block is an updated casting, however, and no longer compatible with the earlier version. I fix the stuff for this company that builds steel and wood pole structures, and they just got a brand new Genie scissor-lift with a tray that pulls out of the thing and has a Ford 2.3 installed on it, I recognized it at once even though it was all-new parts. This one was something like a 50hp industrial version :puke:
  10. kiddiccarus New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2003
    Message Count:
    1,298
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    RCA DOME/Aisle 328/Row 3/ Seats 4 and 5 or Bardsto
    :OT:
    Burnt a 328I today with my V-twin, I love when people judge a book by its cover. The 2.3 can be a dominating tool in the right hands, (NOT MINE) lol
  11. 89Stang Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Message Count:
    4,174
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    St.Louis, Mo
    Ford No longer builds the old 2.3.
    It is no the new Duratec 2.3. However I believe it is in its 1st or 2nd year for that. But the 2.3 was around for a very very long time!
    What 74 to 02??? thats a pretty long while for an engine to be around!
  12. Anlushac11 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 17, 2001
    Message Count:
    2,270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    He is referring to the Ford 2.3L industrial motor. It is used in Forklifts and IIRC Volvo had a version in a light delivery truck.
  13. Ray III New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 10, 2004
    Message Count:
    604
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
    No the motors are not the same, just similar. Still, it is THE Ford 2.3 as it was based on the original and is pretty hard to distinguish.
  14. Anlushac11 Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 17, 2001
    Message Count:
    2,270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    The new one in the Ranger is a brand new Mazda motor that has more in common with my 2.0L DOHC in my Probe than it does with a 2.3L Mustang
  15. The Shape Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Message Count:
    2,207
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Location:
    East ARKANSAS Delta
    I have an '87 GT, but I thought I would chime in. I have been lurking around in here abit lately beacuse I am thinking of getting an '87-'93 4 cylinder. I have no plans on ever getting rid of my 5.0 , but I have been wanting a second car for awhile. A few weeks ago I drove a friends '93 2.3 and ended up liking it quite abit. I don't race my 5.0 and don't really have anything but exhaust mods. I have been more into restoring all of the little nickle and dime parts that wear out to put it back as close to factory as possible. I am interested in the 2.3 just beacuse it IS a Mustang! So many people forget that there are alot of people that could care less about doing an 11 second 1/4 mile and just enjoy owning and driving a mustang everyday. I love the fox body mustang and would like to own one with the 2.3 to go with my 5.0. I hate when other 5.0 owners rag on the 2.3 guys I think they are missing the whole point of the mustang hobby.
  16. MSM0075 New Member

    Member Since:
    May 14, 2003
    Message Count:
    749
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Central Jersey
    Too bad your in Arkansas, cause I'm getting rid of my '93 2.3L for cheep.

Share This Page