- Apr 9, 2005
- 3
- 0
- 0
I am intrested in getting a Mach 1 or a GT but I want to know what the difference between the two are? Thanx
djlethalwang said:In my experience, Machs beat almost ALL LS1s.![]()
GTs are hardly even in the same category as far as i'm concerned. I haven't seen a GT at the track here break into 13s yet except for one with spray. I ran [email protected] the other day, which isn't bad for a 6000' DA. I'm hoping for 12s when I make the roadtrip to San Antonio this winter. There was an '05 GTO that couldn't run better than 14.1 here this last Friday![]()
If you have the option, go for the Mach. See the above post for differences or do a search on both the Mach and GT. The difference between a 2V and 4V is quite noticeable, believe me.
Doc GTO said:Hmmmmm . . . .
I like the Mach over the standard GT. You can make the GT pretty fast but you have the 4v motor to start with in the Mach.
I don't run 14.1s . . .![]()
. Me and him went from a dig. I had a ****ty launch, revved it too high. We were even off the line, but he pulled on me by the time I hit the end of 2nd. Through a quarter mile, he only had me by like 3 cars or so. And thats with my subs, spare, and all that junk in the back. I'd like to see what happens when I get a Good launch and have less crap in the rear to slow me down djlethalwang said:In Florida, I would hope you don't run 14.1s![]()
But here, the air sucks so bad that cars run a lot worse than they should. There's a guy here that I raced not too long ago, has a C5 Corvette auto with heads, cam, and long tubes and he ran a 13.2 at the track. He said stock he only ran 14.6. Me and him went from a dig. I had a ****ty launch, revved it too high. We were even off the line, but he pulled on me by the time I hit the end of 2nd. Through a quarter mile, he only had me by like 3 cars or so. And thats with my subs, spare, and all that junk in the back. I'd like to see what happens when I get a Good launch and have less crap in the rear to slow me down
![]()
djlethalwang said:In my experience, Machs beat almost ALL LS1s.![]()
GTs are hardly even in the same category as far as i'm concerned. I haven't seen a GT at the track here break into 13s yet except for one with spray. I ran [email protected] the other day, which isn't bad for a 6000' DA. I'm hoping for 12s when I make the roadtrip to San Antonio this winter. There was an '05 GTO that couldn't run better than 14.1 here this last Friday![]()
If you have the option, go for the Mach. See the above post for differences or do a search on both the Mach and GT. The difference between a 2V and 4V is quite noticeable, believe me.
If that's the best he could muster, I'd ask him what's wrong!dozlert said:...but I did see an impressive Mach 1 that did a 13.6...said all he had was a K&N filter. Thats pretty good.

dozlert said:I have seen many GTOs that were timing better than the 05 GT and Mach 1, but I did see an impressive Mach 1 that did a 13.6...said all he had was a K&N filter. Thats pretty good.
Ijust wanted to add that a mach 1 is a much better platform to mod than a gt. For every mod I do to get better times, u could do the same mod and always be faster...Plus the mach's just look down right mean!mclean2pakid said:I am intrested in getting a Mach 1 or a GT but I want to know what the difference between the two are? Thanx