Muscle Car Facts.

Discussion in 'Other Auto Tech' started by gmantheman, Jan 21, 2009.


  1. gmantheman

    gmantheman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Messages:
    490
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Escondido, CA
    Here is some muscle car facts. Don't get your panties in a bunch like some other people at mustangforums.com if the data, especially the mustang data is slightly off. For the most part it looks correct. http://musclecarfacts.net/performance-data.html
     
    #1
  2. IndyGTA

    IndyGTA New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Indiana
    The Fairlane info is pretty accurate.
    Pretty cool info.
     
    #2
  3. gmantheman

    gmantheman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Messages:
    490
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Escondido, CA
    Thanks, I thought it would be interesting to see how the cars of yesterday performed. I believe with a set of good tires, cars such as the 442 W-30 and Chevelle 454 LS6 would be pulling mid to high 12s.
     
    #3
  4. Gearbanger 101

    Gearbanger 101 Straight Outta Locash
    Super Mod

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2002
    Messages:
    14,501
    Likes Received:
    958
    Trophy Points:
    164
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    The only fact I needed to know was that most of the Muscle Cars of the 60's and 70's weren't the 10-second street terrors we all grew up knowing them to be when we were kids. As cool looking and bad ass as they still are, most could now have their asses handed to them by modestly equipped family sedans. :(
     
    #4
  5. parrish5o

    parrish5o New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    191
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Dirty South
    I agree. The Chevelles, Chargers and Mustangs of yesterday even with the monsterous big blocks just can't compete with what the factory is putting out these days. Don't get me wrong those cars are what made me fall in love with hot rods but technology has come a long way since then.
     
    #5
  6. danrow55

    danrow55 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I loved my '71 Buick Skylark. I guess it didn't rate good enough to be on the list.
     
    #6
  7. synchro

    synchro New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2004
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I know in '73 Hot Rod magazine got 13.5 seconds out of a SD 455 Trans Am. However, by the late '70s the Bandit was "racing" on Olds 403 and Turbo 4.9 power, but by then it was all about style, not speed.:nice:

    [​IMG]

    Smokin' 400

    :flag:
     
    #7
  8. Gearbanger 101

    Gearbanger 101 Straight Outta Locash
    Super Mod

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2002
    Messages:
    14,501
    Likes Received:
    958
    Trophy Points:
    164
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Funny you should mention the T/A. Although the normal Trans Am was a 6.6L, or 4.9L turbo option, the "Bandit" edition had a honkin 455ci big block (punched .030 over to 462cid) under the hood. It was rated at 380hp and 430lbs ft/tq. Bad ass, but still only good for low-14's.

    http://www.78ta.com/banditedition.php

    [​IMG]
     
    #8
  9. walter

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 1998
    Messages:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Location:
    Houston TX
    Lol at the Speedo vs Measured speed. Then they wonder why people get so many tickets.

    Also yikes on those brake distances.... 162ft for 60mph?!? Don't speed in school zones.
     
    #9
  10. synchro

    synchro New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2004
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, I know that car, I believe they used a L75 455, which was just a normal smog motor of the time. So there would be room to tune it up for more power, but the company Trans Am Specialties wanted to keep it emissions legal. That's as far as they could go with a 4 barrel carb and a pair of 2 way cats.

    Look at this 5.3 liter Aston Martin Zagato V8 of 1986, 180 mph was considered fast back then, not now. Now it's a grocery getter. :D

    [​IMG]
     
    #10

Share This Page