Most stupidest dumb modification you've ever seen on a Fox?
- Thread starter 90mustangGT
- Start date
-
Sponsors (?)
You know there is one thing that car is missing, that would really look great on it.
A FIRE.
skunk21
Active Member
Another example of modification fail .
I saw one of these Kit equipped cars going the other way on the I state. I thought that I had to be seeing things, because the quarters had that stupid flat hump. I just assumed it was another guys' failed attempt at hacking up a mustang to make it different, ( who around here does that I wonder? ) I had no Idea it was a kit.
Is this considered fox fail? 4-eyed front end
This looked like it started life as a mustangII, and ended as mustang poo.
oodance:Look at the rear quarters. Look like mustang II.
Either that or a 70 notch. Looks like he stretched the front end to accommodate the wheelbase.
This looked like it started life as a mustangII, and ended as mustang poo.
Look at the rear quarters. Look like mustang II.
Either that or a 70 notch. Looks like he stretched the front end to accommodate the wheelbase.
Hell...even I just noticed the cool custom ROOF RACK
Kabuki_notch
Founding Member
Stever89
5 Year Member
These piss me off too:
Good gawd yes. And they can't even stick 'em on in a straight line.
That is probably the old gfx body kit.
While i certainly wouldn't do it, with the right paint color, good wheels and regular taillights it's not nearly as bad as those pics look.
Would i say i like it? No, but i've seen worse.
Those belong on '79 Pace cars. I generally agree with the big decal thing, but on the early Fox cars i can totally get along with the big Cobra decals on the hood and all that...they're cheesy, but like the flaming chicken hoods on old Trans Ams...they're cool in their own right. You can't put that stuff on an aero nose car though...just doesn't belong.
Example, Hissin Cobra's car:
Ive seen only one 4x4 stang that i would accept, and thats only because it was done up pretty serious with a tube frame and hardcore suspension. Id rather see something like that if done right than see one riced out or crushed.
68stang351
Founding Member
This looked like it started life as a mustangII, and ended as mustang poo.
Look at the rear quarters. Look like mustang II.
Either that or a 70 notch. Looks like he stretched the front end to accommodate the wheelbase.
Oh come on man! You have to know that it was a 69-70 Coupe.
Mustang II, really?
JEEZ! Who am I? Obi Wan Mustangkenobi?!!!How am I supposed to scrutinize a flaming piece of crap like that thing. ( It's hard enough to try and guess what it is, much less what it once was.) Anyway, I thought I already guessed that as my second.
After looking at some actual 69 cars I agree that that was once a 69 coupe, but what is going on w/ the quarters and rear bumper? that hoopty looked a little too round to be a 69-70 car
68stang351
Founding Member
lol! I was just pokin' at you!
That thing is seriously bad though. What a piece of crap. I can't figure out why anyone would do that.
Even if it was done right it would still look terrible.
BTW, I do like the way your coupe is coming along! Great work!
Since this happened
I hope i'm worthy with my 393 stroker turbo can back this cowl up!
peace
john
