I dont think that will happen with the 05 since it looks older than the current Mustang. I kind of like that.
siege said:the styling may well be "retro" but personally I think its totally modern. had the original bodystyles been different, this style would still rule.
and yeah, the 03/04's look kinda cheesey to me now
Car Nut said:I love the retro look. The 2005 makes perfect sense to me and will be a car that can be enjoyed from many angles. I can't wait to see the view from the driver's seat.
Ron Jeremy said:What do you mean that the 99-04 Mustang is a STEP BACK from the 94-98 cars??
The 94-98 Mustangs all were rounded looking and they resembled the Mitsubishi Eclipse in styling and looks. The 94-98 Mustangs were FUGLY. They also had much lower horsepower than the 99-04 Mustangs. I suggest that you get your facts straight.
On the other hand, the 99-04 Mustang is nicer looking, not rounded, much faster with more HP and Torque than the 94-98 Mustangs, and it doesn't look like a Mitsubishi Eclipse. These are the facts.
I agree. I'm tired of all the aero cars. Lets get back to making them look good.Ron Jeremy said:With what you are saying here you definitely like rounded looking cars. I don't. The 94-98 Mustangs are too rounded looking. Compare them with the 99-04 Mustang and you will see what I mean. A Mustang is not supposed to look round like the Mitsubishi Eclipse. I could of bought a Mustang in 1994 and 1997, but I didn't because the shape of the car didn't appeal to me. But when the 99's came out they looked more like a Mustang. I own 2 of them now.
The whole point behind my post here is that auto manufacturers are making cars too rounded. They all look the same and they are ALL FUGLY. The extra HP and torque of the 99-04 Mustang makes up for the drag coefficient that they may lack. I don't really care for a lower drag coefficient in a car if it has high HP and torque like the 99-04 Mustang does. The high HP and torque compensates for this. I would rather have a car with a higher drag coefficient and higher HP and torque which is nicer looking than one which looks FUGLY and that is all rounded like the 94-98 Mitsubishi Eclipse Mustang.
Ron Jeremy said:Retro is the ONLY WAY to go. I wouldn't say and beleive in this if Ford had made the Mustang nicer looking all thruout the years 1979-1998. The Mustang during all those years (1979-1998) may have been fast, but it sure was FUGLY. Their design did not coincide with the earlier 1960's and early 70's designs. Let's face it. Ford walked away from making a nice looking Mustang after 1973. They screwed up BIGTIME on the design of the Mustang and either made it too boxy (1979-1993) without the 1960's and early 70's Mustang design cues or they made it too rounded (1994-1998). Only in 1999 did Ford make the Mustang look more like it did back in its heyday during the 60's and early 70's. And now Ford is making the 2005 Mustang look even nicer. It's keeping its 1960's and early 1970's heritage design and styling with more modern looks and more features than ever that the 60's and early 70's Mustangs never had. Ford has finally done to the current Mustang what it should have done many years ago. They finally made it look like a Mustang and not like a shoebox or a rounded looking car like it once used to be.
Ron Jeremy said:The 94-98 Mustangs were FUGLY.
dude I think the foxes are lovely lookin, especially 87-93
PIMTOUT said:what comes around goes around.....in the year 2050 we will think the new fox looking mustang is the ****nit....lol