02 gt vs srt300c

Discussion in 'SN95 4.6 Talk' started by rrl, Dec 15, 2006.

Page 2 of 2

  1. streetstang03 unModerator

    Member Since:
    Dec 27, 2003
    Message Count:
    2,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,


    no its not; its faster.
    streetstang03, Dec 16, 2006
    #21

  2. d98gt Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2002
    Message Count:
    4,243
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    SE Texas
    nevermind..read it wrong :(
    d98gt, Dec 16, 2006
    #22

  3. DBMSTNG I fantasize about it being BIG!

    Member Since:
    Apr 24, 2002
    Message Count:
    3,952
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Location:
    not quite here
    how 'bout no.
    DBMSTNG, Dec 16, 2006
    #23

  4. bigcat start with the upper hole, and if more traction is

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2005
    Message Count:
    4,250
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    7200 feet
    you cant compare a car you see everyday (S197) to something that is hard to see on the road (SRT8)? track times are similar. a few tenths mean nothing on the street. if you raced a S197 and got beat, you cant beat a SRT8. if you beat the S197, then it would be a good milestone to judge the outcome.

    still dont see my view?
    bigcat, Dec 17, 2006
    #24

  5. ADRENLN Active Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Message Count:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Location:
    NJ
    the srt magnum runs slower times then the srt 300 and charger. most likely due to weight. that is probably the high 13's you saw for the magnum. the other two cars will run under a 13.5 every time.

    get the cams in then run him.
    ADRENLN, Dec 17, 2006
    #25
Page 2 of 2

Share This Page