93 2.3l Bored Over!!!

Discussion in '2.3L (N/A & Turbo)' started by Dhood-93LX, Jul 25, 2009.

  1. Dhood-93LX New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Message Count:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am new here i have a 93 2.3l hatch i have had it for 3 years it runs great i have 2 extra motors for it and was thinking about maybe boring one of them to a bigger displacement but dont quite know if that would be a good idea any thoughts would be valued thanks.
    DANIEL







    Sweet 93 LX 2.3L Hatch.
  2. GT40 2 Member

    Member Since:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Message Count:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    What are you going to bore it out to? 2.5?
  3. Dhood-93LX New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Message Count:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That or i heard if i went with the svo head i would be able to bore it to a 3.0 i am not sure if it would be worth it or just find a 5.0 and be done with it
  4. Red_LX Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need por

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 1998
    Message Count:
    10,498
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
    You do not BORE an engine for bigger displacement. You have to use a stroker crank for that.

    The max you can probably get on a 2.3L with stock rotating assembly by boring is maybe 2.5 or 2.6, and that more or less eliminates the possibility of boring it later because the cylinder walls will be so thin.

    Esslinger sells kits to stroke the engine to a 2.8 and 3.0, but those are intended for race applications, and the kit to do costs more than your car is worth.
  5. 65ShelbyClone Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 9, 2000
    Message Count:
    4,561
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Antelope Valley, SoCal
    That and anything over ~2.7L is going to be best achieved with a tall deck block....which in used condition is also going to cost more than your car is worth....if you can find one for sale.
  6. Red_LX Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need por

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 1998
    Message Count:
    10,498
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
    Oh yeah, that too...forgot about that tidbit.
  7. Brando5641 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Message Count:
    127
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    FT Gibson OK.
    Red_LX
    Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need porn pics!!

    lol love that :flag:
  8. Bloodire New Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Message Count:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Didn't they already try a 2.5 in the ranger that was nothing more than a bored 2.3?
  9. 57fairlane New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Message Count:
    563
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Oakwood, GA
    no, its .275" longer stroke.

    the 2.3 is a bored out 2.0 . . .
  10. Red_LX Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need por

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 1998
    Message Count:
    10,498
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
    Well, sort of.

    The 2.0 as used in Pintos had a considerably different head and a couple other differences from the 2.3.

    The 2.0 used in rangers was actually a "debored" 2.3.
  11. 65ShelbyClone Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 9, 2000
    Message Count:
    4,561
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Antelope Valley, SoCal
    Guys, lets try not to confuse any newbies.

    A 2.3 cannot simply be bored out by 0.160"/4mm to get a 2.5; the cylinders are nowhere near thick enough. Sonic checking is recommended for overbores beyond 0.040". Most easily have room for 0.020-0.040, some go more, and occasionally one will balloon a cylinder with less.

Share This Page