CDC Flashback for SEMA - GT500 Power

Discussion in 'Classic Talk' started by MRaburn, Oct 23, 2007.

  1. MRaburn Founder/Owner

    Member Since:
    Aug 1, 1998
    Message Count:
    8,306
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Auburn, AL
  2. pushrod power Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Message Count:
    577
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    After reading about the problems with Unique Performance who seemed to be well funded, I look at projects like this with a very jaded view now.

    I hope they do well but if I were a propsective buyer I would be leery.
  3. suki243 Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Message Count:
    696
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Southern California
    sounds cool, wonder how much it is, i couldn't find a price. I think unique was way overpriced
  4. pushrod power Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Message Count:
    577
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    It doesn't mattef if they were overpriced or not. They seemed to be a large, well funded operation and look what happened to them. That's all I'm saying.
  5. bnickel Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Message Count:
    5,642
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Location:
    lubbock, texas
    whoa...there are a lot of realy cool mods to that car most are very subtle but really make the car stand out. i have to say that is THE cleanest SEMA mustang i've ever seen. this thing put anything the Ring brothers have ever done to shame, not to say that their cars aren't cool but this one stands way above theirs IMO. i like the interior and undercarriage especially, about the only thing i don't like is the mod motor but i'm heavily biased toward the small pushrod ford v8. i only wish ford would have built the LS motors instead of GM, in fact the LS motor has a lot of things about it that remind of a small ford motor.
  6. tank_567 Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 20, 2007
    Message Count:
    571
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Raleigh, Nc
  7. 4MuscleMachines New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Message Count:
    411
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    TEXAS
    ^^ :drool: :drool:

    Now put that engine in a 70 or 71 Mustang and its: :drool: :drool: :drool:
  8. bnickel Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Message Count:
    5,642
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Location:
    lubbock, texas
    actually, Frank i'd rather see one of your boss motors in that car with EFI and THAT would be the ultimate 67 fastback.
  9. EricButler New Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That color kills the car. It would be a lot better with a different/better looking color. Top notch build quality though.
  10. bnickel Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Message Count:
    5,642
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Location:
    lubbock, texas

    ya think? i think it makes the car all that much more subtle, really goes with the rest of theme...understated.
  11. ron67fb Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 3, 2001
    Message Count:
    1,118
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    SF Bay area, CA
    I always like seeing rear bumpers that fit that tightly. Looks like a lot of cutting and welding, unless it's fiberglass. That color is straight out of the gaudy show-car era of the 1950s. All it needs are whitewall tires. Why no pictures of the front end? Interior doesn't work for me - modernized seats, panels and console yet they keep the stock dash? That drilled hole behind the scoop looks terrible.

    I don't see the allure of someone building a custom car for you with the style chosen by the builder. Can't people think for themselves anymore?
  12. bnickel Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Message Count:
    5,642
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Location:
    lubbock, texas
    the color is Brittany blue which is a stock 67 color and they painted it to match the other car which was in the november issue of mustang monthly. BTW, Brittany blue was also a stock 67 shelby color too. the console is actually built in the 68 shelby style and the seat swap is common for lot's of people with early stangs. the other car has a nicely done set of fox body seats upholstered to look lik stock 68 seats.
  13. ron67fb Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 3, 2001
    Message Count:
    1,118
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    SF Bay area, CA
    It looks a bit "pearly" in the pics, hence my 50s comment. Just like I thought Bigmac's dark green car looked awesome in his personal pics, yet the magazine pics were an oddball glowing green.

Share This Page