Damn am i stupid or what..

Discussion in '2.3L (N/A & Turbo)' started by jstang209, Jul 10, 2004.

  1. jstang209 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 4, 2004
    Message Count:
    622
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    79 mustang in my back yard

    there a 79 mustang in my backyard.. i barley noticed today that it is a v8.. is it a 5.0 or 4.2.. i read from a site that only 4.2l and 2.3t's were only made in 79.. someone help me out and please tell me i got a 5.0 :)
  2. Pro-Hawk New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 5, 2003
    Message Count:
    990
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well slow down just a bit... I think they used that other V8 thats only like 150 hp. Also with the carb off is there something covering the intale holes up? If not then the motor may need rebuilt.
  3. jstang209 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 4, 2004
    Message Count:
    622
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    yea i found that out.. 150hp.. thats kinda gay.. but i bet it'l sound better then my 4cly.. and will my manual tranny bolt up to this engine.. b/c i read that they were only made with auto's.
  4. Red_LX Doubt I could be of much help, unless you need por

    Member Since:
    Aug 21, 1998
    Message Count:
    10,471
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    78
    You had a '79 Mustang sitting in your yard and only just now noticed?

    Anyway, if it's a 79 it's most likely a 4.2L. I believe 4.2's were debored 302's, and they can't be bored back out to a 302. From what I've heard they're basically boat anchors because you can't get any decent performance out of them.
  5. jstang209 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 4, 2004
    Message Count:
    622
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I alwayz thought it was a 2.3 i never really looked under the hood.. but what does bored/debored mean.. and is it any faster than my 2.3.. also since its comming out of a fox body will it easly bolt up to my 89.. im not really trying to race anyone... but wont it sound like its fast lol. will my manual tranny bolt up to it to? :shrug:
  6. Asha'man Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Message Count:
    1,917
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Some moron just went through the boat-anchor swap recently, against the advice of us and the 5.0 board. The 4.2 is really such a piece of **** that it's not worth your time or effort to swap it. If you're such a masochist as to still want to swap in a nearly-useless motor, at least get a 5.0 from a Lincoln or Cougar or T-bird or something....then you'll have at least some kind of performance potential, and it'll be a much easier swap. Don't be an idiot - ditch that 4.2 ASAP.

    Ash
  7. Pro-Hawk New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 5, 2003
    Message Count:
    990
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hey Hey now that 4.2L would be a great motor...on Junk yard wars if that was all that was left to pick from :nice:
  8. jstang209 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 4, 2004
    Message Count:
    622
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    well its not a 4.2 its a 5.0 just not a High Output 5.0, if you baiscally got a free one, you wouldnt "ditch" your 2.3... anything is better than a 2.3
  9. The Shape Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Message Count:
    2,207
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Dude has it really been that long since you mowed the yard? How do you find a car you didn't know you had in your own backyard. That is hard for me to believe and I'm from Arkansas, a place where broken down cars are considered lawn ornaments! :D
  10. red89lxstang New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 20, 2004
    Message Count:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    lol.. its just i never paid any attention to them.. we only got 3 back there.. i knew it was a mustang, but it looked gay and slow so i never looked under the hood
  11. Pro-Hawk New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 5, 2003
    Message Count:
    990
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wait tell you get a hot rod and come up against a sleeper :D
  12. tiny4lx New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Message Count:
    143
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hold on guys. I had a 79 ghia and it had a 302. Numbers did match and i used all 302 parts intake,headers.cam and pistons for a 302.
  13. The Shape Founding Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Message Count:
    2,207
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah the '79 had the plain 302. The '80 and '81 models had the 4.2 and the 5.0 H.O. showed up in '82.
  14. Pro-Hawk New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 5, 2003
    Message Count:
    990
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ok I just coudn't remember the years on them. It came with a 140 hp 302 but the probly still remains of what shape its in :shrug: I would totaly rebuild that sucker before I droped it in. While its being rebuilt I would get a few things like: Cam, Intake, and a Carb for it. Now if he's got some money I would do something with those heads ;)
  15. 351wcoupe New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Message Count:
    1,845
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    yeah nobody mentioned the 79 pace cars had 302's so a 302 came in something. You can say what you want about any of the engines that came in those cars......88 Turbocoupe still out powers it.:p
    The 4.2 is a 255ci. I'm talking race car.....I encourage you to do the swap.I'll supply the engine because I probably have one I'll give you.:ralugh:

    Just kidding
    I've just never heard anything good either though.

Share This Page