BlackVert
15 Year Member
ok, maybe more like 325 (+/-), but more than 312 ...Why 340 TQ? Is this a 331 block or something?
ok, maybe more like 325 (+/-), but more than 312 ...Why 340 TQ? Is this a 331 block or something?
ok, maybe more like 325 (+/-), but more than 312 ...
I told Ed I was looking for 300rwhp but drivability was key...I've seen these combos get 290+ with a 65mm tb too. I'll post the graph tonight, I'm going to pick the car up in a bit so I'll get the a/f & ask about the fp too.
It's gotta be a missed part or a super conservative tune imo
thanks Grady,
I would have got a 77mm or 80mm MAF if they were easier to get, but I didn't want to settle with the 75mm due to quality issues (or so Ive heard).
Im leaving right now to go, he did call me back and tell me the a/f was 12:1...is that a bit rich? I'll ask about the SAE value too...
That is excellent rwtq for a 5.0 H/C/I ..maybe you didn't know that.
Hmmm... I too would expect more since it appears VERY similar to my combo. Who put the parts on?
I made 304rwhp/331rwtq SAE BTW with my setup.
max torque is almost always higher than max hp. and it is definately higher than hp until 5252 rpm.KC, I always thought your sig said 293rwhp?..and where is everyone getting 330rwtq on a 302? Am I going bonkers or is that seem high?
ONLY an hour? you must not have gotten home until like midnight ...But no worries b/c it's only an hour drive each way...
KC, I always thought your sig said 293rwhp?..and where is everyone getting 330rwtq on a 302? Am I going bonkers or is that seem high?
You need more RPM my man. They left about 1000 RPM on the table by only taking it out to 5500. I do that with my stock junk and trick flow manifold. Did you get the PS3 upgrade package that Ed C sells for those AFRs?
Adam
It always made 293-294rwhp on Kauffman's dyno. I continued to tune and tweak it at the track with my eec tuner and I then had it dyno'd at Cecil county dragway the day i ran 12.1 at 112.5mph and it made the 304rwhp/331rwtq.
http://www.mustangmods.com/ims/u/617/2461/22565.jpg
'94ChickStang- Why on earth did they stop the dyno pull so early? The AF looks goods, although my car made more power down in the high 12:1 range than it did at 13:1.
Are you sure the cam was degreed in right and that the valvetrain geometry was setup correctly?
It sounds to me like the Closed Loop issues throwing cel codes and
all that held you back with your efforts on the dyno.