factory lightweight?

Discussion in '2005 - 2009 Specific Tech' started by 66Satellite, Jan 2, 2004.

  1. 66Satellite

    66Satellite Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    665
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Has Ford ever built a factory lightweight Mustang? Could be a cool and fairly inexpensive limited edition model with a slight bump in HP and a few suspension tweaks but mostly stuff like a lighter interior with no AC, no rear seat, lighter front seats, less soundproofing, light weight hood, etc. I read in Grassroots Motorsports how they removed something like 700-800 pounds from a 5.0 Mustang. I'm sure you couldn't sell a car new with a lot of the stuff they removed to do that, but it would be cool to see what the factory could do and still have a legal and affordable car.
     
    #1
  2. skywarp

    skywarp New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2003
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sounds like a 2005,06 Cobra R to me.
     
    #2
  3. 245/45ZR-17

    245/45ZR-17 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    South Texas (RGV)
    Sounds to me like thats a good idea for a 4.6 LX... :shrug:

    Less sound deadening material, lighter rims/tires, less interior amenities(a/c, stereo delete), aluminum hood, no fogs, no wing, optional rear seat delete...but with everything that makes up a GT. Like the 3V 4.6 and a 5-speed manual. Maybe even some lower rear end gears? 3.73's?

    I bet hardcore drag racing enthusiasts would buy them up. Man this is getting me excited!
    Now if only I had 30 grand+ laying around for an o5' (gotta have mods too)... :bang:
     
    #3
  4. downsouthman1

    downsouthman1 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    645
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    Sounds like any of Ford's Cobra Rs. 1995 & 2000 so far. & the next will likely have a V10 w/ 432 HP @ the whells w/ 403 lb/ft of torque there to w/ other intersts.
     
    #4
  5. DBMSTNG

    DBMSTNG I fantasize about it being BIG!
    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,925
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Location:
    not quite here
    the sn95 GTS had no power windows or locks, no spoiler, no foglights and cloth only seats.
     
    #5
  6. 351CJ

    351CJ New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,769
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wasn't there a 1968 Mustang, 428 CobraJet Drag Pack option that included weight reductions?
     
    #6
  7. 88 Fox GT

    88 Fox GT New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,851
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Iowa
    Yes, 1965-68 were light. My 65 weighed 2500 lbs with the 6 cylinder. It's now about 2800 lbs with the 302.

    I think the major thing that makes the mustangs so heavy now is, the engine is large and heavy, electronics are heavy, and metal body panels. If they went to fiberglass or something it would be really light.
    The vette weighs about 3200 lbs doesn't it?
     
    #7
  8. 351CJ

    351CJ New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,769
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The engine is not that heavy,
    5.0 V8 - 450 lb
    4.6L SOHC 2V iron block = 530 lb
    4.6L SOHC 3V aluminum block =~ 460 lb

    What has brought the weight up is:
    front impact standards
    rear impact standards
    power seat
    power windows
    bigger wheels
    bigger tires
    bigger brakes
    crash beams in doors
    side impact protection standards
    Air bags
    power rear view mirrors
    sub-woofer amplifier
    gas vapor recovery system
    catalytic converters

    I may sound like a bunch of little crap, but it all adds up in a hurry.
     
    #8
  9. 66Satellite

    66Satellite Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    665
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think Porsche makes a factory lightweight version of the 911 (non-turbo) but maybe they don't sell it in the US. There were factory lightweight Mopars in the 60s (aluminum front ends and fenders, etc.). I bet Ford could dump 2-300 pounds easy and 500 if they were creative and still be legal. Just an idea. What did they do to the 1995 & 2000 Cobra Rs to make 'em lighter?
     
    #9
  10. Boss 351

    Boss 351 Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,535
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Toronto
    1961-62, 1200lbs Mustang prototype :p
     
    #10
  11. awalbert88

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2001
    Messages:
    601
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Lancaster, PA
    All the new federal crash standards that these new cars must meet are increasing the weight quite a bit. Even traditionally lightweight cars like sport compacts are getting a bit heavier. I'd love to see a mostly fiberglass body for a sub-3000lb Cobra R model with a nicely tweaked 600hp V10. Viper what? ZL1 who?

    Given Ford's desire to move SVT massively upscale, I wouldn't be surprised to see SVT get the green light for a Mustang-derived supercar to replace the Ford GT in a few years. Might want to give it a new name, though, as it would be so radically different that "Cobra R" just wouldn't be appropriate anymore.
     
    #11
  12. ZStanger

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    337
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Pity City
    It does sound like an "R."

    In the muscle car era of the 60's/early 70's, many (probably more than you think) cars were for racing. They came from the dealership, w/ No A/C, no radio, no console, etc, etc, etc. But had high performance 454's, 440's, 429's, etc, w/ 4 speeds, and 3.90 to 4.11 rear ends. STOCK! Factory-Built Drag cars in disguise.

    Some Examples: RoadRunners, GTX's, Mach's/Bosses, Cutlasses (442s), Torinos/Fairlanes, Chevelles, GTO's, Buick GS's and GSX, the list goes on.
     
    #12
  13. TomP

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2001
    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Delta BC
    Any idea what the 2005 is gonna weigh? Every body style change keeps getting heavier... the 65-66 Mustangs are lighter than 67's, the 67-68's were lighter than 69's ... now the "big boat" 71-73's are lighter than current Mustangs!

    The factory lightweights would have started with the 65 AFX cars, then the 66 AFX long nose cars then the 68 "Winternationals" CJ's. None were exactly mass produced until the Cobra R's came along.
     
    #13
  14. 66stanger347

    66stanger347 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    don't forget the factory-prepped '67 trans-am mustangs for Titus and the boys :D
     
    #14
  15. tylers65

    tylers65 I've got your tool right here!

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2001
    Messages:
    3,672
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    57
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    Sorry, but those were not "factory prepped" they were Shelby prepped. Trans-Am cars in 1967 were prepped by Shelby or their prospective team. Ford had little to do with it besides not building the cars all of the way. No drive train, no interior, basically the teams were given rolling chassis and told to stick to the rules set forth by SCCA.
     
    #15
  16. Enzora

    Enzora The member formerly known as Nazgul

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Are you thinking of the GT3? RWD instead of AWD to save weight, among other things.
     
    #16
  17. nomuffler

    nomuffler New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Messages:
    341
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Awash in a sea of decedant luxury and meaningless
    Lots of copper wire
    In the Cobra the IRS
    fat people riding in the car
     
    #17
  18. Enzora

    Enzora The member formerly known as Nazgul

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Chapel Hill, NC
    :bs:

    Fat people can't fit in Stangs. Or if they can, they don't like to, and avoid it as much as possible.
     
    #18
  19. tylers65

    tylers65 I've got your tool right here!

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2001
    Messages:
    3,672
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    57
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    Let me remind everyone here that just because you are not over weight in any way does not mean that someone else may not be. Let's try to take everyones feelings into consideration.
     
    #19
  20. siege

    siege New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2003
    Messages:
    652
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Peoria, AZ
    I'm "big boned" (kinda) and I can fit in my stang :)
     
    #20

Share This Page