Foxes vs. 94-95's

Discussion in '94-95 Talk' started by RedStallion43, Feb 11, 2006.

  1. RedStallion43 New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    62
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Alright this maybe a stupid question, but I just got done watching a few racing videos and all i ever see are 5.0 foxes, even at local drag strips, and there usually dominating whatever it is that they are racing. My question, why is that I never see 94-95's anywhere, never in videos, never at the track, we have the 5.0 too. I know are cars sell for a little more and are like 200 or so pounds heavier, but they made lots of Sn95 5.0's why arent there more at the tracks? Maybe a dumb question I dunno :shrug:
  2. donjohn New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,770
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    probably because they're more expensive and 200 lbs more.

    if i were to make a race car it'd probably be a fox, i don't want to rip out the interior and make mine a track only car

    you said it.
  3. SeventyMach1 Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep

    Member Since:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,972
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I think you answered this one .......


  4. final5-0 New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Message Count:
    6,803
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Might have something to do with

    For every 1000 Fox Stangs Ford made

    They made 1 Stang that was a 94 or 95

    Grady
  5. SeventyMach1 Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep

    Member Since:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,972
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36

    Really? What were total prod. #'s for Fox's & 94-95's?
  6. 95GTV8 New Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Message Count:
    425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    that is very interesting, i also would like to see the total production #'s
  7. SWYZ721 New Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Message Count:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If I were building a drag car, I would go with a Fox.

    Street car or daily driver ,SN95 would be better, inerior much nicer IMO.
  8. final5-0 New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Message Count:
    6,803
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Heck Justin

    I really don't know
    but
    They did make way way more Fox Stangs than ours

    Lets see Fox years were from, I think, 1979 to 1993
    and
    we have ours for only 2 years

    Grady
  9. 91LX_5L Founding Member

    Member Since:
    May 13, 2002
    Message Count:
    1,971
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    foxes = perfect dag cars. small, light.
  10. SeventyMach1 Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep

    Member Since:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,972
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I emailed Stew .... the registry guy. Hopefully he can tell me exact prod. #'s.
  11. RedStallion43 New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    62
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you guys think in maybe 10 years when our cars will be as old as the foxes are now, that people will be less reluctant to use 94-95's as drag cars? Cuz i see alllooot of run down 94-95 mustangs right now, imagine in 10 years
  12. 94MustangGT5.0 New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 30, 2003
    Message Count:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It all comes down to expenses in my opinion. A buddy and myself both bought 5.0's within a fairly close time span. He bought an '88 LX 5.0 with 78,000 miles and I bought a '94 GT 5.0. He paid $2,800 and I paid $8,000. Both cars were in great shape, but the perks of the 94+ cars make them much more expensive. Everything from 4 wheel ABS disc brakes to nicer interior design to better body lines makes their price tags heftier. On the flip side, that left my buddy with $5,200 worth of mods before he caught up to my level of spending. His was faster than mine STOCK... let alone after he added full BASSANI exhaust, a Kenne Bell, and all the bolt ons... still for cheaper than I had a '94 stock AOD-E GT. (I am still slightly bitter.. haha) That my friend is why people buy fox bodies, and I suppose the weight thing makes a difference too.
  13. HISSIN50 "How long do you think it'll take me to get any he

    Member Since:
    Jul 2, 2003
    Message Count:
    30,794
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Agreed. Grady's numbers idea is right on.
    The fox also has more underhood room and more interior room, both of which can be nice. No ABS, often no air bags, simpler puter, boatloads of parts, etc etc.

    An interesting dynamic (dont know how universal it is) is that the 96-97 mod motor cars sell for less here than the 5N95's.
  14. fox racer New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Message Count:
    584
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i always thought that was tru bc those cars are DOGS and need some serious dough to get movin, unlike foxes, and 95 gts to say the least.
  15. nmcgrawj Advanced Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 28, 2003
    Message Count:
    3,671
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66

    Whoa whoa whoa....dont talk down to them like we are THAT much farther ahead stock:D Yea our cars my be funner cause of the different powerband...but still...both cars we dogs when stock.

    I do agree that our cars are probably easier to get goin fast. But i dont know much about the 4.6's and mods...so i cant honestly say for sure or not.
  16. final5-0 New Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Message Count:
    6,803
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What is the prob here Nate :shrug:

    It is true ... Is it not ..............

    The first few years, mod motored Stangs were pretty bad.

    How is that any different from these facts

    Stock AODE Stangs are down in 1/4 times from Stock stick Stangs

    Stock 94-95 Stangs are down in 1/4 times from Stock Fox Stangs

    Things are ...... what they are

    Grady
  17. nmcgrawj Advanced Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 28, 2003
    Message Count:
    3,671
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66

    There is no problem. I wasnt trying to change any facts...just that yea, 96-98's were slower...but by how much? 94-95's can run what, high 14s to low 15's stock depending on the car/driver right? Where do 96-98's come in at?

    I guess my point was just that we arent fast enough to say that their car is a dog. I could see if we all had LS1s....then our car and their car would be a dog stock. I guess i just didnt understand the trash talking...to trash talk ya gotta be better...and i just dont see that when stock.:shrug:
  18. fox racer New Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Message Count:
    584
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    your right, somewhat. all stock cars can be considered dogs (stangs mostly, especially stock geared AODs). but the 96-98's were not only the slowest mod motors, but they are SERIOUSLY restricted untill you at least swap the non PI heads and intake (96-98) with the PI heads and intake (99-04). thats why i called them dogs.

    Plus, we all kno (especially in this part of the forums) that the Fox Body is teh winnn!!!!!1!!!!!11!!! lol :D
  19. SeventyMach1 Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep

    Member Since:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,972
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Wow .... we got way off topic here.


    FWIW, my friend's car is a NON-PI headed GT ..... he runs mid 7's in the 1/8 mile. Naturally aspirated. :D

    [IMG]
  20. HISSIN50 "How long do you think it'll take me to get any he

    Member Since:
    Jul 2, 2003
    Message Count:
    30,794
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    76
    I'm sorry if my post was what got us off track. My point in my first point was simply that it seems to me that people might recognize the 5N95 niche a little bit more these days and desire our [two years] more than a newer version [first mod motor cars].
    Not really unlike how I would take an 03-04 cobra over an S197 any-day any-time (not a power or any other comparison, other than I would take the older car over the newer one).

Share This Page