If this is a repost, please remove.
On a Mustang Dyno
254.1 rwhp @ 5500rpm
274.8 rwtq @ 3750rpm
On a Mustang Dyno
254.1 rwhp @ 5500rpm
274.8 rwtq @ 3750rpm
Mustang dynos measure the horsepower under load, so the rollers have resistance against the car when they are spinning.. A Dynojet does not, which is why it generally has higher numbers than the mustang dyno. The Dynojet will generally put down another 10-15% more whp than a Mustang Dyno. With this %, this Mustang will put down about 280+rwhp on a regular Dyno.....matching or surpassing stock '03-'04 Mach 1s in rwhp/tq.Silverbull271 said:Come on guys!!!
A STOCK Mach 1 puts down 275-285 at the RW
You guys think that the '05 can run with a Mach or possibly beat it....Maybe after a couple of grand of MODS
The mach 1 is not the same league as a GT is. That's like comparing a saleen to a cobra - sure it's about the same thing but they are different things in a big way. The mach 1 is a suped-up GT with a lot of revamped cues to give it the edge it should have for being what it is - a special novelty car.Silverbull271 said:Come on guys!!!
A STOCK Mach 1 puts down 275-285 at the RW
You guys think that the '05 can run with a Mach or possibly beat it....Maybe after a couple of grand of MODS
Silverbull271 said:Come on guys!!!
A STOCK Mach 1 puts down 275-285 at the RW
You guys think that the '05 can run with a Mach or possibly beat it....Maybe after a couple of grand of MODS
SVTdriver said:And yet in another thread on this very site. Apparently an 05 did beat a mach.
87'GTstang said:The mach 1 is not the same league as a GT is. That's like comparing a saleen to a cobra - sure it's about the same thing but they are different things in a big way. The mach 1 is a suped-up GT with a lot of revamped cues to give it the edge it should have for being what it is - a special novelty car.
You you want something to compare, then compare the old GT to the new and either way you look at it the new 3 valve 4.6 puts out some good power over the old 4.6. Not to mention what, the new GT at the rear wheels puts out 6 hp less than the old one does at the crank - still not a bad job at all if you ask me.
BTW, a couple grand you are referring to i'de happily throw towards a super/turbo charger and most definitely will beat it then. I know not much about the new 4.6 but i'm sure it is no different than alsmot all other stang V8s have been in the past - tuner-friendly and responds impressively to modifications. Bring on and welcome the new pony with pride I say!
Silverbull271 said:BS....Im surprised at you SVT....I take your opinions into consideration....you of all people should know that the post you are talking about is as big of BS that BS can get
TrueBlueCajun said:Mustang dynos measure the horsepower under load, so the rollers have resistance against the car when they are spinning.. A Dynojet does not, which is why it generally has higher numbers than the mustang dyno. The Dynojet will generally put down another 10-15% more whp than a Mustang Dyno. With this %, this Mustang will put down about 280+rwhp on a regular Dyno.....matching or surpassing stock '03-'04 Mach 1s in rwhp/tq.
TrueBlueCajun said:Mustang dynos measure the horsepower under load, so the rollers have resistance against the car when they are spinning.. A Dynojet does not, which is why it generally has higher numbers than the mustang dyno. The Dynojet will generally put down another 10-15% more whp than a Mustang Dyno. With this %, this Mustang will put down about 280+rwhp on a regular Dyno.....matching or surpassing stock '03-'04 Mach 1s in rwhp/tq.
Scot_94GT said:I dont get it...How can one dynomometer be off by 15%? That is a fairly big difference. Regardless of the method used for measuring, the car is putting down the same amount of power and torque. One of them is obviously wrong, so which is it?
jasonlee0704 said:Neither of them are wrong.
It would be like asking, "My flywheel HP is so much higher than my rear wheel HP, obviously one of them is wrong, which is it?"
Resistance = parasitic power loss.
In any part of science, HOW you measure is just as important as WHAT you measure.
ryanrule said:this car needs to rev higher. look at that hp curve