oliverqueen said:You can't even answer my question,once again.....WHERE IN THE MAGAZINE DID IT SAY THAT THE V6 AFFECTED THE VOTING??????????? Do you work for Motor Trend? Do you know how their voting works??? Enlighten me,because it's sure as hell is not in the magazine? Also,It's the Ford Mustang that's up for the award,not the Mustang GT,it's the 911,not just the 911S,The 300 won,not just the 300C. How stupid is that to divide up the cars like that and just pick and choose what you want represented! Are you one of these moron mustang owners who thinks that the only "real" mustang is a V8????
Please,i'm begging you,answer my question......WHERE IN THE MAGAZINE DID IT SAY THAT THE V6 AFFECTED THE VOTING?? You can't tell me,because it's not in there
I think it is quite reasonable to assume that if they include the V6 model in the article box about the Mustang (bashing it's HP as worse than the Accord), they are using the V6 in the testing criteria as well as the GT. If they were only putting up the GT against the test criteria, what point is there in mentioning the V6 model? It's called logic. Try it.
This is not apples to apples comparison. A great V8 and a great V6 model vs. a V6 model only. If the GT was destined to win (just a hypothetical) but the V6 was underpowered and they gave the award to some other car that only came in a V6, would you think that fair? I don't. Seeing the bias is not hard. Read the first two sentances:
"Whether Ford will ever be able to build a modern, affordable GT is debatable."
(Huh? WTF? Didn't they just do that with this car, as SO many other car reviews say?)
"In the meantime...(meaning..we don't think they have, so we'll wait and deal with this '05 car for now)....the first all new Mustang in 26 years is here, and, though decades overdue....(nice little swipe at Ford).....it's worth the wait.
Hmmm.... MotorTrend loves Ford; that's easy to see.