saw a gto

Discussion in '2005 - 2009 Specific Tech' started by audioslave, Feb 6, 2004.

  1. foghorn67

    foghorn67 I'll save you the time and choke myself
    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2002
    Messages:
    2,179
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    that was a memorable statement.
    don't worry, everything else you said has been endless drivel. :D :nice:
     
    #81
  2. Dr_EluSivE

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,387
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Location:
    Central Illinois
    Ok, the GTO's are very "Pontiac" looking and borderline ugly. Not Asstek or avalanche looking ugly. I DO like the new mustang but it isnt the ONLY good looking car. The BMW M3 is Very nice, and This car DEFINATLY isnt Ugly.

    AstonMartin V12 Vanquish.
    [​IMG]

    Dr.
     
    #82
  3. XtorT'r

    XtorT'r New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    386
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota, YAAA

    :worship: :drool: :worship: :drool: :hail2:
     
    #83
  4. Ron Jeremy

    Ron Jeremy New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2003
    Messages:
    753
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Hollywood, California...I live next door to Jenna
    About the picture of the Aston Marton above: It's still rounded looking. I don't like it. Rounded looking cars are ugly. I don't care how fast they are or what type of technology and performance they have. Period.

    And to answer the other person's question in here about whether I like the Mustang to look like the boxy Jeep or the boxy Hummer. The answer is NO. I wouldn't want the Mustang to look like the boxy Jeep or the boxy Hummer. I want it to look just like it did during the 60's and early 70's. Those were the ONLY years when the Mustang looked really nice. During the years after that the Mustang looked like $hit. IT DIDN'T LOOK LIKE A FRIGGIN MUSTANG! WTF! How many times do I have to repeat myself? You got to be retarded to not understand me. Or you got to be a generation Xer or Yer who has doesn't remember how nice a real Mustang used to look like in the 60's and early 70's. Because if you did, you wouldn't be telling me that I want the Mustang to look like the boxy Jeep and the boxy Hummer. It's not what I meant when I made my previous post here. Read and try to understand what you are reading when I make a post in here. Jeeeeez! :bang:
     
    #84
  5. RedHot91GT

    RedHot91GT New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2003
    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Surprise, AZ
    Kinda sounds like a ricer that likes to drive bricks.
     
    #85
  6. RydeOn

    RydeOn Licensed to Chill
    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2000
    Messages:
    6,281
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    77
    Location:
    orange county, CA
    I dont like the M3 either. Actually Ive always thought beemer sucked. Ive driven them and they suck. There exhaust note sounds crappy too, and they make this whiny sound when they rev, I dunno I just dont like 'em. I see where Ron is coming from. The Aston Martin is awesome. The GTO is sad, but could be worse (like the asstek)
     
    #86
  7. shatner saves

    shatner saves New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Messages:
    590
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I got a chance to get up close to a v12 aston martin 2 years ago and that car is just stunning. And I don't buy this rounded=ugly stuff. There is a big difference between the jellybean shapes around today and say... an E-type Jaguar. Not a lot of flat surfaces or angular corners on that car and it is probably one of the sexiest cars aver built IMO.
     
    #87
  8. Z28x

    Z28x New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    658
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Albany NY
    THe new Aston Martin DB9 is hot too, Sorry hear you don't like anycars with curves Ron, your missing out.

    Jelly bean = all VW and Ford 500
     
    #88
  9. GelatiCruiser

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2002
    Messages:
    1,083
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    1 Mile South of Somewhere.
    :stupid:
     
    #89
  10. RiceEating5.0

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2001
    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think the GTO is a good looking car albiet a little too conservatively styled. Overall, a nice package.

    Aston=sex on wheels. Don't see how one would consider it ugly. I'd seriously have to question Ron’s taste in cars. To say that an 05 mustang looks better than an GTO is one thing (I too think 05 looks better), and to say it looks better than the M3 is close to overboard (E46 M3 is damn sexy), but putting it above the Aston is crossing the line to absurdity. The Aston can almost be consider the epitome of style.
     
    #90
  11. GelatiCruiser

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2002
    Messages:
    1,083
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    1 Mile South of Somewhere.
  12. RiceEating5.0

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2001
    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    *drool* :worship: :drool:. I'd give both nuts for that Aston. Heck, i'd throw in a kidney, and my first born:D.

    Rounded and curvy, yet not femme. That looks VERY muscular, a lot more so than the angular 05 Mustang or 67 era Mustang (which look muscular in their own right).

    Never thought someone would use the term "ugly" to describe an Aston Martin:bang: :shrug:.
     
    #92
  13. RealQuick

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    335
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    MA
    Haha! Some of you guys are hard up and need this 05 stang bad huh. If you ever get to drive one, you'll probably be disappointed in the performance. 300hp... :notnice:
     
    #93
  14. GelatiCruiser

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2002
    Messages:
    1,083
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    1 Mile South of Somewhere.
    That A.M. V12.....gaggagaagggaa :drool: :drool: :hail2: :drool: :drool:
     
    #94
  15. KnRs88

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Chicago suburb
    My 98' has ONLY 305hp with less torque than the 05', and Im happy with her. I don't think any one is hard up for the new stang, just excited. :shrug:
     
    #95
  16. shatner saves

    shatner saves New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Messages:
    590
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A paxton or vortech supercharged version running on 91 octane would easily be 400hp/400 lb-ft and still be reliable, AND still be under 30K.

    I like the sound of that.
     
    #96
  17. Golions

    Golions New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2003
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Fast, but rice.
     
    #97
  18. Z28x

    Z28x New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    658
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Albany NY
    Rice?????
     
    #98
  19. RiceEating5.0

    Founding Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2001
    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Rice??? How so? That is the "Hartge" M3.

    Me thinks you're using the term "rice" a bit liberally here. That car is clean and devoid of rice.
     
    #99
  20. shatner saves

    shatner saves New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Messages:
    590
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Absolutely. I can't understand why more people in this board don't like this car. I think it's pretty slick.
     
    #100

Share This Page