yellow5.0cobra
Founding Member
Friedchicken said:RealQuick, he said if Ford made.... blah blah blah, so I was correcting him. Ford does make... blah blah blah. He didn't say anything about a production 4.6L or whatever...
I swear, stupid arguments are found on both sides of the camp... Hrmm I wonder what is the common denominator. (Edit: this is not directed towards you RQ).
I will make my point crystal clear for masses... The 03 cobra was not cool because it had to be blown- hence it (4.6L) is a pos. Now, someone does it to the GTO, and it's gods gift to the LS1.
While I think that engine bay is incredible, I will not jump on a bandwagon because someone is the first. I say, lets see the numbers on the dyno and the track. Then lets all forget it's a Chevy and be impressed.
Friedchicken said:I will make my point crystal clear for masses... The 03 cobra was not cool because it had to be blown- hence it (4.6L) is a pos. Now, someone does it to the GTO, and it's gods gift to the LS1.
While I think that engine bay is incredible, I will not jump on a bandwagon because someone is the first. I say, lets see the numbers on the dyno and the track. Then lets all forget it's a Chevy and be impressed.
yellow5.0cobra said:So did Ford...
Your point is???
If Ford had a N/A 4.6 DOHC pushing 390/390, I would be massively impressed.
Roush21 said:HAHA i agree...Friedchicken is driving a 03 cobra and he's like "they had to supercharge it" duh what did your car come w/ factory????
Friedchicken said:And what do you call the powerplant in the 2000 R?
Saleen4971 said:i call it an NA 5.4 DOHC?
yellow5.0cobra said:If Ford had a N/A 4.6 DOHC pushing 390/390, I would be massively impressed.
Volldamort said:I just prefer more refined technology as opposed to increased size to achieve power
It's not like that. The LS engines are excellent motors for the application. But, given the same displacment... 5.4L ford = 385 and 5.7 chev = 405... both are on par from the factory when calculating hp/L. In supercharged applications, I would give the edge to fords setup and their head design.02LS1 said:Increased size?
So I guess GM should just throw the 5.7 in the garbage and start making smaller, more technologically advanced motors becuase Ford chose to do so? GM has been using the "350" for decades...it's not like they just started making them. It's worked (and still does) very well...so if it ain't broke...
You prefer the 4.6, that's fine. It's a great motor but IMO so is the LS1/LS6/LS2.
Friedchicken said:5.4L ford = 385 and 5.7 chev = 405
Uncle Meat said:I agreee with your argument, just wanted to correct you on the Liter-to-Cubic inch conversion.... 1 liter equals 61.02 cubic inches.
5.7L = 347.6 C.I.
5.4L = 329.5 C.I.
U.M.
Friedchicken said:It's not like that. The LS engines are excellent motors for the application. But, given the same displacment... 5.4L ford = 385 and 5.7 chev = 405... both are on par from the factory when calculating hp/L. In supercharged applications, I would give the edge to fords setup and their head design.
That being said, both engines have their strengths and weaknesses.
RealQuick said:He was listing hp numbers...not CI
Z28x said: